Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1997 Aug;41(8):1761–1764. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.8.1761

A study to determine the pharmacokinetics and inflammatory fluid penetration of two doses of a solid formulation of the hexetil prodrug of a trinem, sanfetrinem (GV 104326).

R Wise 1, J M Andrews 1, L Da Ros 1, J Child 1, D Mortiboy 1
PMCID: PMC164000  PMID: 9257756

Abstract

The trinem sanfetrinem (GV 104326) was administered as the oral hexetil prodrug GV 118819X in two dose levels to six healthy volunteers. A single dose equivalent to 125 mg of sanfetrinem was administered, followed 6 weeks later by a single dose equivalent to 500 mg of sanfetrinem. The concentrations of the drug in plasma, cantharidin-induced inflammatory fluid, and urine were measured with a microbiological assay. The stability of sanfetrinem was studied in serum and inflammatory fluid. The mean peak concentrations in plasma of 0.77 and 2.47 microg/ml were attained at 1.1 and 2.0 h after the 125- and 500-mg doses, respectively. Mean peak concentrations in inflammatory exudate of 0.26 and 0.86 microg/ml were attained at 2.80 and 2.67 h after the 125- and 500-mg doses, respectively. The mean terminal elimination half-lives in plasma were 1.33 and 1.97 h for the 125- and 500-mg doses, respectively. The half-lives in the inflammatory fluid were 1.66 and 1.74 h for the 125- and 500-mg doses, respectively. The overall penetration of the drug into the inflammatory fluid was 51.4 and 47.0% for the 125- and 500-mg doses, respectively. Mean urine recovery was greater following 500 mg (24.15%) than after 125 mg (18.4%) of sanfetrinem. Sanfetrinem was relatively unstable in the inflammatory exudate in vitro (half-life, 5.5 h), and this could explain the poor penetration of the drug in the inflammatory exudate observed in this study.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (189.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett J. V., Brodie J. L., Benner E. J., Kirby W. M. Simplified, accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):170–177. doi: 10.1128/am.14.2.170-177.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Di Modugno E., Erbetti I., Ferrari L., Galassi G., Hammond S. M., Xerri L. In vitro activity of the tribactam GV104326 against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Oct;38(10):2362–2368. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.10.2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drusano G. L. An overview of the pharmacology of imipenem/cilastatin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Dec;18 (Suppl E):79–92. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_e.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wise R. Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):839–845. doi: 10.1007/BF02111350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wise R., Gillett A. P., Cadge B., Durham S. R., Baker S. The influence of protein binding upon tissue fluid levels of six beta-lactam antibiotics. J Infect Dis. 1980 Jul;142(1):77–82. doi: 10.1093/infdis/142.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wise R., O'Sullivan N., Johnson J., Andrews J. M. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ampicillin and brobactam following oral administration of 2085P. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 May;36(5):1002–1004. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.5.1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wise R. The pharmacokinetics of the oral cephalosporins--a review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26 (Suppl E):13–20. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES