Abstract
The mechanism of glycopeptide resistance in the genus Staphylococcus is unknown. Since these antimicrobial compounds act by binding the peptidoglycan precursor terminus, the target of transglycosylase and transpeptidase enzymes, it was hypothesized that resistance might be mediated in Staphylococcus aureus by increased production or activity of these enzymes, commonly called penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). To evaluate this possibility, glycopeptide-resistant mutants were prepared by passage of several clinical isolates of this species in nutrient broth containing successively increasing concentrations of the glycopeptide vancomycin or teicoplanin. Decreased coagulase activity and increased resistance to lysostaphin were uniformly present in the vancomycin-resistant mutants. Peptidoglycan cross-linking increased in one resistant isolate and decreased in two resistant isolates. The amounts of radioactive penicillin that bound to each PBP in susceptible and resistant strains were compared; PBP2 production was also evaluated by Western blotting. Increased penicillin labeling and production of PBP2 were found in all resistant derivatives selected by either vancomycin or teicoplanin. Moreover, the increase in PBP2 penicillin labeling occurred early in a series of vancomycin-selected derivatives and was strongly correlated (r > 0.9) with the increase in vancomycin and teicoplanin MIC. An increase in penicillin labeling also occurred, variably, in PBP1, PBP3, and/or PBP4. These data demonstrate a strong correlation between resistance to glycopeptides and increased PBP activity and/or production in S. aureus. Such an increase could allow PBPs to better compete with glycopeptides for the peptidoglycan precursor.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (785.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arthur M., Reynolds P., Courvalin P. Glycopeptide resistance in enterococci. Trends Microbiol. 1996 Oct;4(10):401–407. doi: 10.1016/0966-842X(96)10063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barna J. C., Williams D. H. The structure and mode of action of glycopeptide antibiotics of the vancomycin group. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1984;38:339–357. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.38.100184.002011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chambers H. F., Miick C. Characterization of penicillin-binding protein 2 of Staphylococcus aureus: deacylation reaction and identification of two penicillin-binding peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Mar;36(3):656–661. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.3.656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daum R. S., Gupta S., Sabbagh R., Milewski W. M. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin: isolation and purification of a constitutively produced protein associated with decreased susceptibility. J Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;166(5):1066–1072. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.5.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georgopapadakou N. H., Dix B. A., Mauriz Y. R. Possible physiological functions of penicillin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):333–336. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.2.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaatz G. W., Seo S. M., Dorman N. J., Lerner S. A. Emergence of teicoplanin resistance during therapy of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. J Infect Dis. 1990 Jul;162(1):103–108. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knox J. R., Pratt R. F. Different modes of vancomycin and D-alanyl-D-alanine peptidase binding to cell wall peptide and a possible role for the vancomycin resistance protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1342–1347. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.7.1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labischinski H. Consequences of the interaction of beta-lactam antibiotics with penicillin binding proteins from sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1992;181(5):241–265. doi: 10.1007/BF00198846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mainardi J. L., Shlaes D. M., Goering R. V., Shlaes J. H., Acar J. F., Goldstein F. W. Decreased teicoplanin susceptibility of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;171(6):1646–1650. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.6.1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milewski W. M., Boyle-Vavra S., Moreira B., Ebert C. C., Daum R. S. Overproduction of a 37-kilodalton cytoplasmic protein homologous to NAD+-linked D-lactate dehydrogenase associated with vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jan;40(1):166–172. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.1.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murakami K., Fujimura T., Doi M. Nucleotide sequence of the structural gene for the penicillin-binding protein 2 of Staphylococcus aureus and the presence of a homologous gene in other staphylococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994 Apr 1;117(2):131–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06754.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Callaghan C. H., Morris A., Kirby S. M., Shingler A. H. Novel method for detection of beta-lactamases by using a chromogenic cephalosporin substrate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Apr;1(4):283–288. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.4.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park W., Matsuhashi M. Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus luteus peptidoglycan transglycosylases that are not penicillin-binding proteins. J Bacteriol. 1984 Feb;157(2):538–544. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.2.538-544.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shlaes D. M., Shlaes J. H., Vincent S., Etter L., Fey P. D., Goering R. V. Teicoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expresses a novel membrane protein and increases expression of penicillin-binding protein 2 complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Nov;37(11):2432–2437. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.11.2432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spratt B. G. Penicillin-binding proteins and the future of beta-lactam antibiotics. The Seventh Fleming Lecture. J Gen Microbiol. 1983 May;129(5):1247–1260. doi: 10.1099/00221287-129-5-1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tipper D. J., Strominger J. L. Mechanism of action of penicillins: a proposal based on their structural similarity to acyl-D-alanyl-D-alanine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Oct;54(4):1133–1141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.4.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodford N., Johnson A. P., Morrison D., Speller D. C. Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Oct;8(4):585–615. doi: 10.1128/cmr.8.4.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Jonge B. L., Chang Y. S., Gage D., Tomasz A. Peptidoglycan composition of a highly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. The role of penicillin binding protein 2A. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 5;267(16):11248–11254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]