Abstract
Puumala virus (Bunyaviridae family, Hantavirus genus) causes a mild form of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) called nephropathia epidemica in northern and central Europe. Serological tests are used for diagnosis, but antigen production is difficult because the virus grows poorly in tissue culture. We expressed the N protein (nucleoprotein) of Puumala virus via the Semliki Forest virus (SFV) replicon in mammalian cells and compared its antigenic properties with those of the native antigen derived from Puumala virus-infected cells. Detection of immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), μ-capture ELISA, and indirect immunofluorescence assay was (at least) as effective with the recombinant antigen as with the native antigen when HFRS patient sera or organ washes from wild rodents were tested. No nonspecific reaction was observed. Thus, the SFV-expressed N protein of Puumala virus appears as a valid antigen, specific and sensitive for serological investigations.
Hantaviruses are members of the Bunyaviridae family and possess three single-stranded negative-sense RNA genome segments called L, M, and S (segments named for their size, i.e., large, medium, and small, respectively) (19, 25, 27). Hantavirus infections lead to serious and often fatal diseases: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Hantaan, Seoul, Dobrava, and Puumala viruses are known to cause HFRS in Russia, Asia, and Europe (22), whereas Sin Nombre and related viruses cause hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in the Americas [for reviews, see references 25 and 28). Each group of hantaviruses has a different rodent reservoir: Hantaan, Dobrava, and Seoul viruses are transmitted by rodents of the Murinae subfamily, Sin Nombre is transmitted by Sigmodontinae, and Puumala, Tula, Topografov, and Khabarovsk viruses are transmitted by Arvicolinae. Puumala virus, carried by the bank vole Clethryonomis glareolus, causes a relatively mild but invalidating form of HFRS (also called nephropathia epidemica) in northern and central Europe, particularly in Scandinavia and in the western parts of Russia (22, 23). Numerous cases are reported in Belgium, Germany, Austria, and in the Champagne-Ardennes and Franche-Comté foci in France (4, 7, 11, 12, 20; B. Le Guenno, M. A. Camprasse, J. C. Guilbaut, P. Lanoux, and B. Hoen, Letter, Lancet 343:114-115, 1994). Clinical manifestations are fever, conjunctival infections, thrombocytopenia, and transient renal failure.
Detection of the viral genome by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) in blood or urine samples has been done largely (1, 10, 13, 31) because isolation of the virus in tissue culture is rarely successful. A rapid test by real-time RT-PCR was recently developed for Puumala virus (8). A sensitive immunoassay can also be used for the detection of viral antigens in human specimens (17). Although these techniques are useful to assess viremia, serological tests based on the detection of specific antibodies are widely used for routine diagnosis. During the acute phase of infection, the immunoglobulin M (IgM) level rises, followed by the production of IgG; the early antibody response is induced by nucleoprotein N, the major antigen (6, 18, 34, 40). Serological assays are based on viral antigens expressed in infected cells. However, massive production of viral proteins is rarely observed because the virus grows poorly in tissue culture. In addition, some hantaviruses must be manipulated in a high-security containment facility. Therefore, several laboratories have expressed the N protein as a recombinant protein in Escherichia coli (6, 9, 24, 37) or in insect cells (5, 29, 30, 33, 36).
In this study, we expressed the N protein of Puumala virus in mammalian cells via the Semliki Forest virus (SFV) replicon and compared its antigenic properties with those of the native antigen extracted from Puumala virus-infected cells. The recombinant antigen worked as well, or even better, than the native antigen, in the detection of IgM and IgG in patient sera by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). It was also used to analyze sera or lung and kidney washes from wild bank voles and found very efficient for all these serological investigations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells.
BHK-21 cells were grown in Glasgow minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS), 10% tryptose phosphate, and 10 mM HEPES. BSR cells (a clone of BHK-21) were cultured in Glasgow MEM supplemented with 10% FCS, and Vero E6 cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 5% FCS. Penicillin (5 U/ml) and streptomycin (5 μg/ml) were added. The cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Virus and native antigen for ELISA.
Stocks of Puumala virus (strain Cg 13891) were produced by infecting semiconfluent Vero E6 cells at a low multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10−3 to 10−4. To produce Puumala virus antigen for ELISA, Vero E6 cells were infected and incubated for approximately 2 weeks. The infected Vero E6 cells were trypsinized and mixed with an equal number of fresh cells, which were then used to seed new flasks. When 80% of the cells gave positive results in an IFA, which usually required three passages, the cells were collected, washed with borate buffer (50 mM sodium borate [pH 9.0], 120 mM NaCl), and centrifuged at a low speed. The cell pellet was suspended in 10 volumes of borate buffer containing 1% Triton X-100. Cell lysis was achieved by sonication (four 30-s pulses) at maximal power (300 W). Cell debris was centrifuged at 6,000 × g, and the supernatant was frozen at −80°C.
Serum panels.
An anti-Puumala virus hyperimmune serum was prepared by injecting hamsters intramuscularly with virus inactivated by β-propiolactone. The animals received one or two booster injections at 2-week intervals. Serum was collected 4 to 6 weeks postinfection by cardiac puncture.
Human sera from HFRS patients (mostly from the Champagne-Ardennes and Franche-Comté areas of France) were from the serum collection of the Centre National de Référence. Rodent materials (sera or lung and kidney washes) were obtained from bank voles (Clethryonomis glareolus) captured during field epidemiological studies in Ardennes, France (F. Boué, unpublished data).
Cloning the N gene in pSFV-1.
The nucleoprotein gene was synthesized by RT-PCR using the RNA of Vero E6 cells infected with Puumala virus strain Cg 13891. Reverse transcription was performed with primer 5NPU (5′-GGCCAGATCTATGAGTGACTTGACAGAC [the BglII site is underlined]) and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega). The cDNA was amplified by PCR using primers 5NPU and 3NPUU90 (5′-GGCCAGATCTTTATTTATATTTTTAAGGGCTC [the BglII site is underlined]) and Goldstar Taq polymerase (Eurogentec) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids were constructed by standard protocols (2). The PCR product was digested by BglII and ligated with T4 DNA ligase into pSFV-1, which had previously been linearized at the BamHI site and dephosphorylated. The ligation product was used to transform competent TOP 10 bacteria. Selected colonies were amplified, and recombinant plasmids were analyzed with restriction enzymes and by sequencing using the ABI Prism automatic sequencer and the Big Dye terminator kit (PE Applied Biosystems).
Production of recombinant virus.
Suicide viruses were produced in BHK-21 cells by the protocol of Liljeström and Garoff (3, 14, 15) using pSFV-1 and helper plasmid pSFV-H2. The viral titer was determined as infectious units per milliliter by IFA using a rabbit serum directed against SFV nonstructural protein nsP3 (kindly provided by L. Kääriäinen).
Recombinant antigen was prepared from BSR cells infected with SFV-Npuu by the method used for native antigen, except that the cells were suspended in bicarbonate buffer (100 mM sodium bicarbonate [pH 9.5]) in the absence of detergent and the cells were sonicated to obtain cell extracts.
Western blot analysis.
Proteins from whole-cell extracts were separated by electrophoresis of polyacrylamide gels (10% polyacrylamide) in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and transferred to a Hybond C membrane (Amersham). The membrane was incubated, first for 1 h at room temperature in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-0.1% Tween 20) and 5% milk and then for 16 h at 4°C in the same solution with the addition of hamster Puumala virus-specific antibodies. After the membrane was washed with PBS-0.1% Tween 20, it was incubated for 2 h at room temperature with the peroxidase-labeled goat anti-hamster antibodies (Sigma) and washed. The reaction was revealed by chemiluminescence (Super Signal; Pierce).
IFA.
At 24 h postinfection, BSR cells infected with SFV-Npuu or SFV-Npuuanti containing the insert in the antisense orientation (or SFV-1) at an MOI of 10 were trypsinized, washed with PBS, seeded on glass slides, and fixed by drying with acetone for 30 min at −20°C. Alternatively, to preserve cell morphology, cells were first seeded on cover slides, infected with the recombinant virus, and fixed in situ with methanol at −20°C. The cells were then incubated with the serum diluted in PBS-10% FCS-0.1% Tween 20 for 30 min at 37°C, washed with PBS-0.1% Tween 20, and incubated with the fluorescein-labeled goat secondary antibody (Sigma) for 30 min at 37°C. Antibodies from wild rodents were detected using a mixture of goat antibodies against hamster (CALTAG Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.), rat and mouse IgG (Sigma).
Detection of IgM by μ-capture ELISA.
Human μ chain-specific antibodies raised in goats (Sigma) diluted at 1:1,000 in PBS were added to the wells of a 96-well plate and incubated for 16 h at 4°C. Human sera diluted 1:100 were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. After the wells were washed, the native antigen diluted 1:100 or the recombinant antigen diluted 1: 250 to 1: 1,000 (depending on the batch) was added to the wells, which were incubated for 2 h at 37°C and washed. Anti-Puumala virus antibodies from hamsters were then added. After the wells were washed and incubated for 1 h at 37°C with peroxidase-labeled anti-hamster IgG antibodies (Sigma), the fixed antibodies were revealed by the enzyme substrate (tetramethyl benzidine) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (KPL). The intensity of the reaction was measured by the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) corrected for the adsorption due to the plastic of the wells, given by OD620. The background OD for the control noninfected cells was subtracted from the OD in the presence of antigen. The cutoff value was determined as the mean plus 3 standard deviations of the negative sera.
Detection of IgG by ELISA.
Wells of 96-well plates were coated with the cellular extracts diluted in PBS. The optimal dilution of the antigen was determined in a preliminary test in which various dilutions of the antigen were tested with a reference serum. Usually, the optimal dilutions (i.e., the highest dilution giving a high response) were 1:1,000 for the recombinant antigen and 1:500 for the native antigen. After incubation with the patient sera, goat peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG antibodies (Sigma) diluted 1:2,000 were added. The fixed antibodies were visualized, and the results were analyzed as described above for IgM.
Biological samples of rodents were diluted 1:16 and visualized by a mixture of peroxidase-labeled goat secondary antibodies against hamster (CALTAG Laboratories), rat and mouse IgG (Sigma).
RESULTS
Production of SFV-N virus and characterization of the recombinant N protein.
Plasmid pSFV-Npuu was constructed by inserting the entire open reading frame of the Puumala virus N protein into pSFV1 at the unique BamHI site. Four positive clones were analyzed, and the orientation of the insert was determined by sequencing. We noted three nucleotide changes (A→C at position 59, A→G at position 140, and C→T at position 758) with regard to the published sequence (7) (GenBank accession number U22423). These three nucleotide changes modify the amino acids as follows: Asp→Ala, Asp→Gly, and Ser→Phe, respectively. The changes at positions 140 and 758 were found in all four clones sequenced, suggesting that they were not due to a PCR error. The difference observed at position 59 might represent a heterogeneous viral population (21). Plasmid pSFV-Npuuanti containing the insert in the antisense orientation was also selected and used as a negative control. RNA synthesized in vitro from the DNA plasmid template was electroporated into BHK-21 cells together with the helper RNA derived from pSFV-H2, enabling production of suicide virus (14). These infectious particles enter the cell and replicate but cannot generate new virions due to the absence of genes coding for the structural proteins in the replicon. The expression of N protein was characterized in BSR cells by Western blotting and IFA. The N protein was revealed by using hamster serum raised against Puumala virus. Extracts of Vero E6 cells infected with Puumala or Hantaan virus were loaded in the gel as controls. The recombinant protein migrated as a single band to the same position as the viral nucleoprotein of Puumala virus, and Hantaan virus nucleoprotein migrated slightly faster (Fig. 1). As expected, no band was visible in noninfected (mock-infected) control cells (Fig. 1), in cells infected with the control replicon (lane SFV-1), or in the cells infected with SFV-Npuuanti virus (not shown).
FIG. 1.
Western blot analysis of recombinant Puumala virus nucleoprotein. Proteins from 4 × 104 BSR cells infected with SFV-NPuu, SFV-1, or Vero E6 cells not infected (mock) or infected with Puumala virus (Puumala V) or Hantaan virus (HTN V) were analyzed in a 10% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a membrane incubated with hamster anti-Puumala antibodies revealed with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies. The positions of N proteins from Puumala and Hantaan virus (N Puu and N HTN, respectively) are indicated to the right of the blot. The positions of molecular size standards (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the blot.
Expression of the recombinant nucleoprotein was also revealed by IFA, using the hamster serum raised against Puumala virus (Fig. 2). The staining was found only in the cytoplasm and exhibited an organized pattern like the one observed in Puumala virus infection. No reaction was detected in cells infected with the SFV-Npuuanti control virus or SFV-1.
FIG. 2.
Immunofluorescence of the recombinant Puumala virus nucleoprotein expression. (A) BHK cells infected with SFV-N (MOI = 0.1), (B and C) BSR cells infected with SFV-N (MOI = 3) or not infected (C). Cells were fixed in situ with methanol and analyzed using hamster serum raised against Puumula virus, followed by a fluorescein-labeled secondary antibody.
Detection of antibodies against Puumala virus nucleoprotein in human sera.
To test the reactivity of the N protein for diagnosis or serological surveys, a panel of 88 positive and 57 negative human sera was analyzed using the recombinant N in an ELISA. Of these sera, 47 positive and 11 negative sera were tested by IFA.
IFA.
All of the 47 sera from HFRS patients gave positive results with the native and recombinant antigens at the usual 1:64 dilution (Table 1). The 11 sera from HFRS-negative patients showed no reaction with either native or recombinant antigen, as expected. Six HFRS-positive sera were titrated. The titer, expressed as the highest reciprocal dilution giving a positive response, was similar with both antigens for all of the sera, except one for which the titer with the recombinant antigen was lower than that with the native antigen (256 with recombinant nucleoprotein compared to 1,024 with native antigen). This difference might be due to the contribution of the antibodies to the glycoproteins, which could be titrated only with the native antigen.
TABLE 1.
Comparison of the abilities of Puumala virus recombinant and native nucleoprotein antigens to detect HFRS antibodies in an IFA
| Patients | No. of samplesa
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rN
|
nAg
|
|||
| Positiveb | Negative | Positiveb | Negative | |
| HFSR positive | 47 | 0 | 47 | 0 |
| HFSR negative | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Number of samples that gave positive or negative results with recombinant nucleoprotein (rN) or native antigen (nAg). The same samples were used to test the recombinant and native antigens.
Positive at the 1:64 dilution.
Detection of IgM by ELISA.
Detection of anti-Puumala virus IgM was performed by an immunocapture test specific for the μ chains. All sera were analyzed at a dilution of 1:100. Eighty-six serum samples were positive for IgM with the two antigens (Table 2), and for most of these samples, the ODs were higher with the recombinant N than with the native antigen. Among these samples, one contained only IgM and no IgG, indicating an early stage of infection. In addition, 57 sera negative with the native antigen were also negative with the recombinant antigen. The IgM titer was determined for 4 sera, but only one titration curve is shown (Fig. 3) because the curves were similar. The titers (defined as the last reciprocal dilution giving an OD higher than the background) were consistently found to be at least twofold higher with the recombinant N than with the native antigen. Since, in this expression system, the SFV nonstructural proteins are present in the cell extracts, all the sera were tested simultaneously against extracts from cells infected by the control virus, SFV-Npuuanti containing the insert in the antisense orientation. As expected, antibodies directed against these proteins were not observed.
TABLE 2.
Comparison of the abilities of Puumala virus recombinant and native nucleoprotein antigens to detect IgM and IgG antibodies in human sera in an ELISA
| Patients | IgM | IgG | No. of samplesa
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rN
|
nAg
|
|||||
| Positiveb | Negative | Positiveb | Negative | |||
| HFSR positive | + | − | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| + | + | 85 | 0 | 85 | 0 | |
| − | + | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| HFSR negative | − | − | 0 | 57 | 0 | 57 |
Number of samples that gave positive or negative results with recombinant nucleoprotein (rN) or native antigen (nAg). The same samples were used to test the recombinant and native antigens.
Positive at the 1:100 dilution.
FIG. 3.
Titration curves of IgM and IgG in HFRS patient sera by ELISA. ELISA for IgM (A) and IgG (B) detection in human sera using the recombinant (♦) or native (▴) antigen.
Detection of IgG by ELISA.
The sera were analyzed at 1:100 dilution. The panel analyzed comprised 87 sera, 2 of which contained only IgG and no IgM (Table 2). All these sera were found positive with the recombinant nucleoprotein, and in most cases, the intensity of the reaction was higher with the recombinant nucleoprotein than with the native antigen. The IgG titers determined for five positive sera were found 2 to 4 dilutions higher with the recombinant N than with the native antigen (Fig. 3). The 57 sera of patients negative for specific IgG (and IgM) were likewise negative with the recombinant nucleoprotein. Immunoglobulin G antibodies against SFV nonstructural proteins were not detected in any of the sera tested.
Detection of anti-Puumala virus antibodies in wild rodent samples.
Since the bank vole Clethryonomis glareolus is the recognized reservoir of Puumala virus, circulation of the virus can be investigated by capture of these rodents and detection of specific IgG antibodies. Therefore, 47 samples (serum samples or lung or kidney washes) obtained from bank voles trapped during field studies were analyzed by IFA and ELISA for IgG, using both the native and recombinant antigens.
All the samples gave positive results (had anti-Puumula virus antibodies) when native antigen was used in an IFA, but the recombinant antigen failed to detect three samples that had anti-Puumula virus antibodies (Table 3). However, in an ELISA, these three samples were positive with both antigens and two other samples were negative with the native antigen but positive with the recombinant nucleoprotein (Table 3). Again, the ODs obtained with the recombinant antigen were identical or higher than those obtained with the native antigen. This was clearly shown when a pool of samples with anti-Puumula virus antibodies was titrated, leading to a higher titer when the recombinant antigen was used (Fig. 4). None of the 17 samples lacking anti-Puumula virus antibodies reacted with the recombinant N in ELISA and IFA.
TABLE 3.
Comparison of the abilities of Puumala virus recombinant and native nucleoprotein antigens to detect IgG in wild rodent samples in IFA and ELISA
| Samplesa | No. of samplesb
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFA
|
ELISA
|
|||||||
| rN
|
nAg
|
rN
|
nAg
|
|||||
| Positivec | Negative | Positivec | Negative | Positivec | Negative | Positivec | Negative | |
| Positive | 44 | 3 | 47 | 0 | 47 | 0 | 45 | 2 |
| Negative | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
Samples with or without anti-Puumala virus antibodies.
Number of samples that gave positive or negative results with recombinant nucleoprotein (rN) or native antigen (nAg) in IFA and ELISA. The same samples were used to test the recombinant and native antigens.
Positive at the 1:16 dilution.
FIG. 4.
Titration curve of IgG in wild rodent samples by ELISA. ELISA for IgG detection in a pool of wild rodent samples using recombinant nucleoprotein (♦) and native antigen (▴).
DISCUSSION
Puumala virus circulates in northern Europe, where it causes thousands of cases of a mild form of HFRS each year. We expressed the nucleoprotein of Puumala virus via the SFV replicon in mammalian cells and compared it to the native antigen in IFA and ELISA for the ability to detect IgG and IgM antibodies in serum samples from patients affected by HFRS or in samples from bank voles. The recombinant antigen appeared to be very sensitive and specific and did not yield any false-positive results. The response to recombinant antigen was often higher than the response to the native antigen. In addition, the two methods, IFA and ELISA, used with the recombinant nucleoprotein appeared to be very efficient; IFA was possibly slightly less sensitive than ELISA, considering that 3 of 47 positive samples from wild rodents were not detected. ELISA using the recombinant protein is highly sensitive: the recombinant (but not the native) protein revealed the presence of HFRS-specific IgG antibodies in two rodents positive by IFA with both antigens. The high sensitivity of the recombinant antigen is probably due to the large amounts of proteins expressed by the SFV vector and to the fact that in contrast to the native antigen, it was prepared without detergent. Initially, the recombinant antigen was prepared like the native one, i.e., in a buffer containing Triton X-100, a method used to solubilize membranes and inactivate the virus (16, 18). The responses obtained with the detergent-treated recombinant nucleoprotein were lower, and some samples that were weakly positive with the native antigen were found negative. Therefore, the method used to prepare the antigens appeared to be of special importance.
In Europe, Puumala virus is a frequent source of infection, but Dobrava and Seoul viruses are also possible pathogens (39; A. Plyusnin, O. Vapalahti, V. Vasilenko, H. Henttonen, and A. Vaheri, Letter, Lancet 349:1369-1370, 1997). It would be interesting to assess the cross-reactivity of the recombinant Puumala N protein with sera from patients infected by other serotypes. Because of the relatively high degree of cross-reactivity between Puumala, Tula, and Topogravov viruses (32, 35), it seems likely that the recombinant Puumala virus antigen could be useful for the diagnosis or seroepidemiology of these viruses.
Hantavirus recombinant nucleoproteins reported so far were produced in E. coli (6, 9, 24, 37), lepidopteran cells, or Drosophila cells (5, 29, 30, 33, 36). The establishment of mammalian cell lines stably expressing the hantavirus nucleoprotein was reported recently (38), but the cell lines were not used in serological tests. It would be of great interest to compare the results obtained with these different antigens, including the nucleoprotein expressed via the SFV replicon, but unfortunately, these antigens were not available in our laboratory. Data published by others revealed that antigens expressed in bacteria suffer from low sensitivities and specificities (6, 36). By developing the SFV-based recombinant antigen, we chose a system enabling expression in mammalian cells rather than in insect cells because of the lower background of most of the sera when we used mammalian cell extracts rather than Sf9 cell extracts as a negative control in ELISA (26). Also, in terms of biohazard, the SFV replicon is of special interest, since it is a noninfectious system which produces a suicide virus incapable of propagating; therefore, manipulation requires a classical (non-high-security) laboratory. In addition, it produced large amounts of the recombinant nucleoprotein: for instance, coating the wells with the recombinant antigen required two- to eightfold-smaller quantities of cell extracts than with the native antigen. Production of the recombinant antigen is more rapid than the native antigen (24 h versus approximately 3 weeks). Moreover, purification of the protein is not required, since cells infected with the SFV without the insert serve as a negative control. Reaction with the control antigen would also indicate the possible presence of antibodies against the nonstructural proteins if the individual had been infected with SFV, a situation that we did not encounter with European samples but which could occur with African ones.
Altogether, our results indicate that the Puumala virus nucleoprotein expressed in the SFV replicon is a good antigen and a valid diagnostic tool for IFA and ELISA for the detection of IgM and IgG in sera from humans or rodents infected by Puumala virus.
Acknowledgments
We thank F. Cliquet for support and interest. We are grateful to all collaborators, especially F. Sauvage, C. Combeau, and J. M. Demerson who made the biological material available for this study.
This work was supported in part by a grant from INSERM/MATE (AC005E).
REFERENCES
- 1.Ahn, C., J. T. Cho, J. G. Lee, C. S. Lim, Y. Y. Kim, J. S. Han, S. Kim, and J. S. Lee. 2000. Detection of Hantaan and Seoul viruses by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in renal syndrome patients with hemorrhagic fever. Clin. Nephrol. 53:79-89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1993. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
- 3.Berglund, P., M. Sjoberg, H. Garoff, G. J. Atkins, B. J. Sheahan, and P. Liljestrom. 1993. Semliki Forest virus expression system: production of conditionally infectious recombinant particles. Bio/Technology 11:916-920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bowen, M. D., W. Gelbmann, T. G. Ksiazek, S. T. Nichol, and N. Nowotny. 1997. Puumala virus and two genetic variants of Tula virus are present in Austrian rodents. J. Med. Virol. 53:174-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brus Sjolander, K., I. Golovljova, A. Plyusnin, and A. Lundkvist. 2000. Diagnostic potential of Puumala virus nucleocapsid protein expressed in Drosophila melanogaster cells. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2324-2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Elgh, F., A. Lundkvist, O. A. Alexeyev, G. Wadell, and P. Juto. 1996. A major antigenic domain for the human humoral response to Puumala virus nucleocapsid protein is located at the amino-terminus. J. Virol. Methods 59:161-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Escutenaire, S., P. Chalon, P. Heyman, G. Van der Auwera, G. van der Groen, R. Verhagen, I. Thomas, L. Karelle-Bui, A. Vaheri, P. P. Pastoret, and A. Plyusnin. 2001. Genetic characterization of Puumala hantavirus strains from Belgium: evidence for a distinct phylogenetic lineage. Virus Res. 74:1-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garin, D., C. Peyrefitte, J. M. Crance, A. Le Faou, A. Jouan, and M. Bouloy. 2001. Highly sensitive Taqman PCR detection of Puumala hantavirus. Microbes Infect. 3:739-745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gott, P., L. Zoller, S. Yang, R. Stohwasser, E. K. Bautz, and G. Darai. 1991. Antigenicity of hantavirus nucleocapsid proteins expressed in E. coli. Virus Res. 19:1-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Grankvist, O., P. Juto, B. Settergren, C. Ahlm, L. Bjermer, M. Linderholm, A. Tarnvik, and G. Wadell. 1992. Detection of nephropathia epidemica virus RNA in patient samples using a nested primer-based polymerase chain reaction. J. Infect. Dis. 165:934-937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Groen, J., M. N. Gerding, J. G. Jordans, J. P. Clement, J. H. Nieuwenhuijs, and A. D. Osterhaus. 1995. Hantavirus infections in The Netherlands: epidemiology and disease. Epidemiol. Infect. 114:373-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Heiske, A., B. Anheier, J. Pilaski, V. E. Volchkov, and H. Feldmann. 1999. A new Clethrionomys-derived hantavirus from Germany: evidence for distinct genetic sublineages of Puumala viruses in Western Europe. Virus Res. 61:101-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Horling, J., A. Lundkvist, K. Persson, M. Mullaart, T. Dzagurova, A. Dekonenko, E. Tkachenko, and B. Niklasson. 1995. Detection and subsequent sequencing of Puumala virus from human specimens by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:277-282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liljestrom, P., and H. Garoff. 1991. A new generation of animal cell expression vectors based on the Semliki Forest virus replicon. Bio/Technology 9:1356-1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liljeström, P., and H. Garoff. 1994. Expression of proteins using Semliki Forest virus vectors, p. 16.20.11-16.20.16. In F. M. Ausubel et al. (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology, vol. 2. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Lundkvist, A., A. Fatouros, and B. Niklasson. 1991. Antigenic variation of European haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome virus strains characterized using bank vole monoclonal antibodies. J. Gen. Virol. 72:2097-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lundkvist, A., J. Horling, S. Bjorsten, and B. Niklasson. 1995. Sensitive detection of hantaviruses by biotin-streptavidin enhanced immunoassays based on bank vole monoclonal antibodies. J. Virol. Methods 52:75-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lundkvist, A., J. Horling, and B. Niklasson. 1993. The humoral response to Puumala virus infection (nephropathia epidemica) investigated by viral protein specific immunoassays. Arch. Virol. 130:121-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nichol, S. T. 2001. Bunyaviridae. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa.
- 20.Pilaski, J., H. Feldmann, S. Morzunov, P. E. Rollin, S. L. Ruo, B. Lauer, C. J. Peters, and S. T. Nichol. 1994. Genetic identification of a new Puumala virus strain causing severe hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Germany. J. Infect. Dis. 170:1456-1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Plyusnin, A., Y. Cheng, H. Lehvaslaiho, and A. Vaheri. 1996. Quasispecies in wild-type Tula hantavirus populations. J. Virol. 70:9060-9063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Plyusnin, A., D. H. Kruger, and A. Lundkvist. 2001. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Adv. Virus Res. 57:105-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Plyusnin, A., and S. P. Morzunov. 2001. Virus evolution and genetic diversity of hantaviruses and their rodent hosts. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 256:47-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Plyusnin, A., O. Vapalahti, H. Lankinen, H. Lehvaslaiho, N. Apekina, Y. Myasnikov, H. Kallio-Kokko, H. Henttonen, A. Lundkvist, and M. Brummer-Korvenkontio. 1994. Tula virus: a newly detected hantavirus carried by European common voles. J. Virol. 68:7833-7839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Plyusnin, A., O. Vapalahti, and A. Vaheri. 1996. Hantaviruses: genome structure, expression and evolution. J. Gen. Virol. 77:2677-2687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Préhaud, C., E. Hellebrand, D. Coudrier, V. E. Volchkov, V. A. Volchkova, H. Feldmann, B. Le Guenno, and M. Bouloy. 1998. Recombinant Ebola virus nucleoprotein and glycoprotein (Gabon 94 strain) provide new tools for the detection of human infections. J. Gen. Virol. 79:2565-2572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schmaljohn, C., and B. Hjelle. 1997. Hantaviruses: a global disease problem. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:95-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schmaljohn, C., and J. W. Hooper. 2001. Bunyaviridae: the viruses and their replication, 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa.
- 29.Schmaljohn, C. S., Y. K. Chu, A. L. Schmaljohn, and J. M. Dalrymple. 1990. Antigenic subunits of Hantaan virus expressed by baculovirus and vaccinia virus recombinants. J. Virol. 64:3162-3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schuldt, C., L. Zoller, E. K. Bautz, and G. Darai. 1994. Baculovirus expression of the nucleocapsid protein of a Puumala serotype hantavirus. Virus Genes 8:143-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schwarz, T. F., S. R. Zaki, S. Morzunov, C. J. Peters, and S. T. Nichol. 1995. Detection and sequence confirmation of Sin Nombre virus RNA in paraffin-embedded human tissues using one-step RT-PCR. J. Virol. Methods 51:349-356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sibold, C., H. Meisel, A. Lundkvist, A. Schulz, F. Cifire, R. Ulrich, O. Kozuch, M. Labuda, and D. H. Kruger. 1999. Simultaneous occurrence of Dobrava, Puumala, and Tula hantaviruses in Slovakia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61:409-411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sjolander, K. B., F. Elgh, H. Kallio-Kokko, O. Vapalahti, M. Hagglund, V. Palmcrantz, P. Juto, A. Vaheri, B. Niklasson, and A. Lundkvist. 1997. Evaluation of serological methods for diagnosis of Puumala hantavirus infection (nephropathia epidemica). J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3264-3268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vapalahti, O., H. Kallio-Kokko, A. Narvanen, I. Julkunen, A. Lundkvist, A. Plyusnin, H. Lehvaslaiho, M. Brummer-Korvenkontio, A. Vaheri, and H. Lankinen. 1995. Human B-cell epitopes of Puumala virus nucleocapsid protein, the major antigen in early serological response. J. Med. Virol. 46:293-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vapalahti, O., A. Lundkvist, V. Fedorov, C. J. Conroy, S. Hirvonen, A. Plyusnina, K. Nemirov, K. Fredga, J. A. Cook, J. Niemimaa, A. Kaikusalo, H. Henttonen, A. Vaheri, and A. Plyusnin. 1999. Isolation and characterization of a hantavirus from Lemmus sibiricus: evidence for host switch during hantavirus evolution. J. Virol. 73:5586-5592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vapalahti, O., A. Lundkvist, H. Kallio-Kokko, K. Paukku, I. Julkunen, H. Lankinen, and A. Vaheri. 1996. Antigenic properties and diagnostic potential of Puumala virus nucleocapsid protein expressed in insect cells. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:119-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang, M., C. Rossi, and C. S. Schmaljohn. 1993. Expression of non-conserved regions of the S genome segments of three hantaviruses: evaluation of the expressed polypeptides for diagnosis of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. J. Gen. Virol. 74:1115-1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Welzel, T. M., R. Kehm, C. A. Tidona, W. Muranyi, and G. Darai. 1998. Stable expression of nucleocapsid proteins of Puumala and Hantaan virus in mammalian cells. Virus Genes 17:185-198. (Erratum, 17:299.) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Xiao, S. Y., G. Diglisic, T. Avsic-Zupanc, and J. W. LeDuc. 1993. Dobrava virus as a new hantavirus: evidenced by comparative sequence analysis. J. Med. Virol. 39:152-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zoller, L. G., S. Yang, P. Gott, E. K. Bautz, and G. Darai. 1993. A novel μ-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on recombinant proteins for sensitive and specific diagnosis of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1194-1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




