Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1972 Sep;65(9):757. doi: 10.1177/003591577206500911

Why epidurals are not more widely used.

J M Burn
PMCID: PMC1644556  PMID: 5085056

Full text

PDF

Page 757

757

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beazley J. M., Leaver E. P., Morewood J. H., Bircumshaw J. Relief of pain in labour. Lancet. 1967 May 13;1(7498):1033–1035. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)91544-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. EISEN S. M., ROSEN N., WINESANKER H., HELLMAN K., AXELROD H. I., ROTENBERG M., RELLE A., SHEFFMAN E. The routine use of lumbar epidural anaesthesia in obstetrics: a clinical review of 9,532 cases. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1960 Jul;7:280–289. doi: 10.1007/BF03028158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Potter N., Macdonald R. D. Obstetric consequences of epidural analgesia in nulliparous patients. Lancet. 1971 May 22;1(7708):1031–1034. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91602-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES