Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1974 Jan;67(1):51–53. doi: 10.1177/003591577406700129

A comparative study of the methods of treatment for haemorrhoids.

C B Jones
PMCID: PMC1645673  PMID: 4544983

Full text

PDF
51

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARRON J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg. 1963 Apr;105:563–570. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(63)90332-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLAISDELL P. C. Prevention of massive hemorrhage secondary to hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958 Apr;106(4):485–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chant A. D., May A., Wilken B. J. Haemorrhoidectomy versus manual dilatation of the anus. Lancet. 1972 Aug 26;2(7774):398–399. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91795-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GRAHAM-STEWART C. W. WHAT CAUSES HEMORRHOIDS?A NEW THEORY OF ETIOLOGY. Dis Colon Rectum. 1963 Sep-Oct;6:333–344. doi: 10.1007/BF02618390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Groves A. R., Evans J. C., Williams J. A. Management of internal haemorrhoids by rubber-band ligation. Br J Surg. 1971 Dec;58(12):923–924. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800581215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES