Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1985 Sep;75(9):1059–1067. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.9.1059

Industrial wastes and public health: some historical notes, Part I, 1876-1932.

J A Tarr
PMCID: PMC1646324  PMID: 3895993

Abstract

This article has focused on the relatively low priority accorded industrial wastes compared to human wastes by the public health community in the period from 1876 through 1932. The critical reason for this prioritization was the potential for acute health effects from human wastes as compared with the belief that industrial wastes had only indirect effects. State departments of health normally only responded to industrial wastes when they endangered the potable nature of water supplies or interfered with water and sewage treatment processes. Within the public health community, however, a relatively small group of interdisciplinary professionals argued for attention to the indirect health effects of industrial wastes and their impacts on the total stream environment. In conjunction with other groups interested in clean streams--such as sportsmen and manufacturers who required high quality process water--they pushed for a broader state legislative mandate in regard to pollution control. Some states created new bureaus or boards with responsibility for industrial wastes and the larger stream environment but the attack on industrial pollution remained limited in this period. The final significant development regarding industrial pollution and public health concerned the formulation by Streeter-Phelps of the Public Health Service of a theory of stream purification with a set of general quantitative indicators. This application was of particular importance in regard to the high-oxygen consuming nature of organic industrial wastes and the wide variety of effluents that existed. Industrial wastes constituted what Harvey Brooks, in his essay "Science Indicators and Science Priorities" calls a very "messy" research problem--one that does "not lend itself to elegant and widely applicable generalizations."(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
1059

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Donaldson W. INDUSTRIAL WASTES IN RELATION TO WATER SUPPLIES. Am J Public Health (N Y) 1921 Mar;11(3):193–198. doi: 10.2105/ajph.11.3.193-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Donaldson W. Industrial Wastes in Relation to Water Supplies. Am J Public Health (N Y) 1922 May;12(5):420–421. doi: 10.2105/ajph.12.5.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fales A. L. Progress in the Control of Pollution by Industrial Wastes. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1928 Jun;18(6):715–721. doi: 10.2105/ajph.18.6.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Monger J. E. ADMINISTRATIVE PHASES OF STREAM POLLUTION CONTROL. Am J Public Health (N Y) 1926 Aug;16(8):788–794. doi: 10.2105/ajph.16.8.788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Waring F. H. Results Obtained in Phenolic Wastes Disposal under the Ohio River Basin Interstate Stream Conservation Agreement. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1929 Jul;19(7):758–770. doi: 10.2105/ajph.19.7.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES