Abstract
This paper examines certain quality of life outcomes, as well as comparative costs of care, for selected types of persons entering three very distinct types of alternative service programs that address the long-term care needs of vulnerable elderly persons: nursing homes (NH), geriatric day hospitals (GDH), and senior center (SC) programs. For selected outcomes, based on secondary analysis of the data gathered in another study, it was possible to add to the comparison samples of similar types of persons entering small foster-type domiciliary care homes (DC). From pools of persons entering these programs, six separate sets of comparison samples who were similar at baseline were constructed (GDH-SC, NH-SC, NH-GDH, NH-DC, SC-DC, GDH-DC). Only analyses pertaining to institutionalization and costs were conducted for the last three sets of comparison groups. Except for the issue of institutionalization, quality of life impact analysis showed only a few more post-test differences than would be expected by chance (although the few post-test differences that were observed in each case favored less restrictive settings). This more general similarity of outcome is indeed provocative, suggesting that in many ways the applicants adapted similarly to these quite distinct programs. Cost analyses found that nursing home and geriatric day hospital care, the two most restrictive settings, were also the two most expensive interventions.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruchlin H. S., Morris J. N. Pennsylvania's domiciliary care experiment: II. Cost-benefit implications. Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):654–660. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherwood S., Morris J. N. The Pennsylvania domiciliary care experiment: I. Impact on quality of life. Am J Public Health. 1983 Jun;73(6):646–653. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.6.646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]