Abstract
The extent to which the values attached to health states are similar in different cultures or social groups is important for understanding health and illness behaviors and for developing standardized health status measures. A cross-cultural study was conducted to compare the health status values obtained in a United States population (Seattle, Washington) with those from another English-speaking culture (London, England) on the Sickness Impact Profile, a standardized measure composed of 136 items. London judges rated the severity of dysfunction described in each item on an equal interval scale using the same methods of scaling and analysis employed in the Seattle study. A regression of English mean item values on US mean values yielded a slope of 1.00 and an intercept of -0.07, indicating that judges gave strikingly similar ratings to most items. Agreement was higher at the more severe end of the dysfunction continuum than at the least severe end, a finding consistent with the notion that what constitutes health is more difficult to define than what constitutes illness. While a universal conception of dysfunction may exist in English-speaking societies, the social and cultural determinants of health status values deserve more systematic study.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Kressel S., Pollard W. E., Gilson B. S., Morris J. R. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6(3):393–415. doi: 10.2190/RHE0-GGH4-410W-LA17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyle M. H., Torrance G. W. Developing multiattribute health indexes. Med Care. 1984 Nov;22(11):1045–1057. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198411000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carter W. B., Bobbitt R. A., Bergner M., Gilson B. S. Validation of an interval scaling: the sickness impact profile. Health Serv Res. 1976 Winter;11(4):516–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlton J. R., Patrick D. L., Peach H. Use of multivariate measures of disability in health surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983 Dec;37(4):296–304. doi: 10.1136/jech.37.4.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patrick D. L., Bush J. W., Chen M. M. Toward an operational definition of health. J Health Soc Behav. 1973 Mar;14(1):6–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patrick D. L., Peach H., Gregg I. Disablement and care: a comparison of patient views and general practitioner knowledge. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Jul;32(240):429–434. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peach H., Green S., Locker D., Darby S., Patrick D. L. Evaluation of a postal screening questionnaire to identify the physically disabled. Int Rehabil Med. 1980;2(4):189–193. doi: 10.3109/09638288009163986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosser R., Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol. 1978 Dec;7(4):347–358. doi: 10.1093/ije/7.4.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sackett D. L., Torrance G. W. The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(11):697–704. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]