Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1986 Feb;76(2):198–200. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.2.198

A worksite smoking modification competition: potential for public health impact.

R C Klesges, M M Vasey, R E Glasgow
PMCID: PMC1646475  PMID: 3946702

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of a worksite smoking cessation/reduction program both with and without formal competition for monetary prizes in five worksites (n = 107). A greater percentage of eligible smokers participated in the competition (88 per cent) than the non-competition (53 per cent) condition. Treatment outcome among participants was generally equivalent across conditions, but at a six-month follow-up, nonabstinent subjects in the competition condition had lower levels of carbon monoxide than subjects in the non-competition condition. On a worksite-wide basis, a higher percentage of employees quit smoking in the competition condition (16 per cent) compared to the non-competition (7 per cent).

Full text

PDF
198

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brownell K. D., Cohen R. Y., Stunkard A. J., Felix M. R., Cooley N. B. Weight loss competitions at the work site: impact on weight, morale and cost-effectiveness. Am J Public Health. 1984 Nov;74(11):1283–1285. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.11.1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Danaher B. G. Smoking cessation programs in occupational settings. Public Health Rep. 1980 Mar-Apr;95(2):149–157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fagerström K. O. Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav. 1978;3(3-4):235–241. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(78)90024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fielding J. E. Health promotion and disease prevention at the worksite. Annu Rev Public Health. 1984;5:237–265. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.05.050184.001321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glasgow R. E., Klesges R. C., Godding P. R., Vasey M. W., O'Neill H. K. Evaluation of a worksite-controlled smoking program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Feb;52(1):137–138. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.1.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Luepker R. V., Pechacek T. F., Murray D. M., Johnson C. A., Hund F., Jacobs D. R. Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. Am J Public Health. 1981 Dec;71(12):1320–1324. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.12.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Malott J. M., Glasgow R. E., O'Neill H. K., Klesges R. C. Co-worker social support in a worksite smoking control program. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):485–495. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Orleans C. S., Shipley R. H. Worksite smoking cessation initiatives: review and recommendations. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES