Abstract
This paper illustrates the usefulness of cartographic and centrographic methods in examining the locational characteristics of health care resources, such as specialist physicians' offices. Cartographic analysis involving map comparisons not only describes the nature of particular spatial patterns, but it also suggests relevant hypotheses on the basis of observed locational relationships among the mapped phenomena. Centrographic analysis generally substantiates the findings of simple map analysis by providing certain objective quantitative measures regarding the basic characteristics of a point distribution; additionally, it generates a graphic summary, the Standard Deviational Ellipse (SDE), which offers a convenient means for direct comparison of multiple spatial patterns. The essentially complementary nature of the two methods is highlighted, and it is concluded that they are most useful when used in conjunction with one another.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brown L. A., Holmes J. Intra-urban migrant lifelines: a spatial view. Demography. 1971 Feb;8(1):103–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gober P., Gordon R. J. Intraurban physician location: a case study of Phoenix. Soc Sci Med Med Geogr. 1980 Dec;14(4):407–417. doi: 10.1016/0160-8002(80)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hugg L. A map comparison of work disability and poverty status in the United States. Soc Sci Med Med Geogr. 1979 Dec;13D(4):237–240. doi: 10.1016/0160-8002(79)90044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer J. D. The role of spatial analysis and geographic data in the detection of disease causation. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(16):1213–1221. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]