Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1986 Nov;76(11):1322–1324. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.11.1322

Decline in the incidence of carcinoma in situ of the cervix.

W H Chow, R S Greenberg, J M Liff
PMCID: PMC1646751  PMID: 3766828

Abstract

Temporal trends in the incidence of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix were evaluated in metropolitan Atlanta between 1975 and 1983. The average annual age-adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 women decreased from 61.5 in 1975-77 to 40.1 in 1981-83 for Whites and from 118.3 to 51.8 for Blacks during the same time periods. The relative declines were uniform across all age groups and exceeded the corresponding reductions in the incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma.

Full text

PDF
1322

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Devesa S. S. Descriptive epidemiology of cancer of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 May;63(5):605–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dicker R. C., Scally M. J., Greenspan J. R., Layde P. M., Ory H. W., Maze J. M., Smith J. C. Hysterectomy among women of reproductive age. Trends in the United States, 1970-1978. JAMA. 1982 Jul 16;248(3):323–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Howe H. L. Age-specific hysterectomy and oophorectomy prevalence rates and the risks for cancer of the reproductive system. Am J Public Health. 1984 Jun;74(6):560–563. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.6.560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lyon J. L., Gardner J. W. The rising frequency of hysterectomy: its effect on uterine cancer rates. Am J Epidemiol. 1977 May;105(5):439–443. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marrett L. D. Estimates of the true population at risk of uterine disease and an application to incidence data for cancer of the uterine corpus in Connecticut. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Apr;111(4):373–379. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miettinen O. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Feb;103(2):226–235. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Parkin D. M., Nguyen-Dinh X., Day N. E. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Feb;92(2):150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Trevathan E., Layde P., Webster L. A., Adams J. B., Benigno B. B., Ory H. Cigarette smoking and dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. JAMA. 1983 Jul 22;250(4):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES