Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1987 Feb;77(2):187–190. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.2.187

Derivation of clinical indications for carotid endarterectomy by an expert panel.

N J Merrick, A Fink, R E Park, R H Brook, J Kosecoff, M R Chassin, D H Solomon
PMCID: PMC1646850  PMID: 3799858

Abstract

We used a two-round consensus panel method to derive and rate the appropriateness of comprehensive sets of detailed clinical indications for performing carotid endarterectomy. Before meeting, nine nationally influential physicians rated 675 indications; after review and discussion, they rated 864. The method did not force unanimity; our purposes were not only to encourage agreement but also to uncover areas of disagreement concerning the procedure's appropriate use. The panelists agreed on the level of appropriateness for 54 per cent of the final 864 indications and disagreed on 18 per cent. Ratings were reliably reproduced six to eight months after the completion of the process. The physicians' indications and ratings were consistent with those in the literature, and statistical analysis demonstrated that they followed logical clinical rationale. We conclude that consensus methods that do not force agreement can be used with panels of physicians to produce detailed, reliable, and valid indications. They can also identify medically controversial reasons for using a procedure that can serve as a starting point for a research agenda.

Full text

PDF
187

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blaisdell W. F., Clauss R. H., Galbraith J. G., Imparato A. M., Wylie E. J. Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. IV. A review of surgical considerations. JAMA. 1969 Sep 22;209(12):1889–1895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M., Brook R. H. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979–983. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldman L., Caldera D. L., Nussbaum S. R., Southwick F. S., Krogstad D., Murray B., Burke D. S., O'Malley T. A., Goroll A. H., Caplan C. H. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977 Oct 20;297(16):845–850. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197710202971601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Park R. E., Fink A., Brook R. H., Chassin M. R., Kahn K. L., Merrick N. J., Kosecoff J., Solomon D. H. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jul;76(7):766–772. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.7.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rennie D. Consensus statements. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):665–666. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thompson J. E., Talkington C. M. Carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg. 1976 Jul;184(1):1–15. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197607000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Warlow C. Carotid endarterectomy: does it work? Stroke. 1984 Nov-Dec;15(6):1068–1076. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.6.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES