Abstract
We convened three panels of physicians to rate the appropriateness of a large number of indications for performing a total of six medical and surgical procedures. The panels followed a modified Delphi process. Panelists separately assigned initial ratings, then met in Santa Monica, California where they received reports showing their initial ratings and the distribution of the other panelists ratings. They discussed the indications and revised the indications lists, then individually assigned final ratings. There was generally better agreement on the final ratings than on the initial ratings. Based on reasonable criteria for agreement and disagreement, and excluding one outlying procedure, the panelists agreed on ratings for 42 to 56 per cent of the indications, and disagreed on 11 to 29 per cent.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chassin M. R., Brook R. H., Park R. E., Keesey J., Fink A., Kosecoff J., Kahn K., Merrick N., Solomon D. H. Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 30;314(5):285–290. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601303140505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eddy D. M. Variations in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. Health Aff (Millwood) 1984 Summer;3(2):74–89. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rennie D. Consensus statements. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):665–666. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thurow L. C. Medicine versus economics. N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 5;313(10):611–614. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198509053131005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wennberg J. E. Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. Health Aff (Millwood) 1984 Summer;3(2):6–32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]