Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1987 Mar;77(3):288–290. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.3.288

Prenatal screening and pregnant women's attitudes toward the abortion of defective fetuses.

R R Faden, A J Chwalow, K Quaid, G A Chase, C Lopes, C O Leonard, N A Holtzman
PMCID: PMC1646896  PMID: 3812832

Abstract

We studied the attitudes of 490 pregnant women toward the abortion of defective fetuses. Three hundred of these women were participating in a prenatal screening program for neural tube defects. Although theoretical accounts of the effects of behavior on attitude would suggest that participation in a screening program would affect abortion attitudes, evidence in support of such an association was weak. The overwhelming majority of women, regardless of whether they had participated in the screening program, believed that women are justified in having an abortion in the face of fetal abnormality. There was a sharp increase in the number of screening program participants who said they would have an abortion when the probability of the fetus being affected with a neural tube defect rose from 95 per cent to 100 per cent.

Full text

PDF
288

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Faden R. R., Chwalow A. J., Orel-Crosby E., Holtzman N. A., Chase G. A., Leonard C. O. What participants understand about a maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening program. Am J Public Health. 1985 Dec;75(12):1381–1384. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.12.1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Faden Ruth, Chwalow A. Judith, Chase Gary A., Quaid Kimberly, Leonard Claire, Holtzman Neil A. Pregnant women's attitudes toward the abortion of defective fetuses. Popul Environ. 1983 Winter;6(4):197–209. doi: 10.1007/BF01363886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hibbard B. M., Roberts C. J., Elder G. H., Evans K. T., Laurence K. M. Can we afford screening for neural tube defects? The South Wales experience. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jan 26;290(6464):293–295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6464.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leonard C. O., Chase G. A., Childs B. Genetic counseling: a consumers' view. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 31;287(9):433–439. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208312870904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sadovnick A. D., Baird P. A. A cost-benefit analysis of a population screening programme for neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn. 1983 Apr-Jun;3(2):117–126. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970030207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smetana Judith G. Beliefs about the permissibility of abortion and their relationship to decisions regarding abortion. J Popul. 1979 Winter;2(4):294–305. doi: 10.1007/BF00972499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES