Abstract
In order to determine the accuracy of the Centers for Disease Control/Health Risk Appraisal (CDC/HRA) program, the authors compared observed to predicted mortality for the 3,135 persons followed from 1959-79 as part of the Tecumseh Community Health Study. The analysis was limited to smokers and never-smokers aged 25-60 whose 1959 questionnaires included at least the minimal variables for prediction using the CDC/HRA (age, sex, race, height, weight, and smoking habits). For men and women overall and in each age group, the observed proportion dying over 20 years of follow-up increased as the difference between 1959 age and risk age increased. CDC/HRA predicted 10-year risks of mortality appeared to improve upon age-sex-race predicted risks of mortality when compared to the observed proportion dying over 10 years and when predictors were used in a logistic regression model with vital status after 10 years as the dependent variable. Thus, CDC/HRA may be an appropriate method for identifying high-risk populations for health interventions.
Full text
PDF



Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- NAPIER J. A. Field methods and response rates in the Tecumseh community health study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962 Feb;52:208–216. doi: 10.2105/ajph.52.2.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith K. W., McKinlay S. M., Thorington B. D. The validity of health risk appraisal instruments for assessing coronary heart disease risk. Am J Public Health. 1987 Apr;77(4):419–424. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.4.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wagner E. H., Beery W. L., Schoenbach V. J., Graham R. M. An assessment of health hazard/health risk appraisal. Am J Public Health. 1982 Apr;72(4):347–352. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.4.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
