Abstract
The rate of cesarean section delivery in the United States rose from 4.5 per 100 deliveries in 1965 to 22.7 in 1985, and in 1985 an estimated 851,000 live births were cesarean deliveries, according to data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This increase has been observed for all ages, and within all regions of the country. The rate for teenagers and mothers aged 20 to 29 was five to six times as high in 1985 as in 1965, and four times as high for mothers aged 30 years and older. Repeat cesareans account for an increasing share of all cesarean deliveries; in 1985 one in three cesareans were repeats. The increase in the cesarean rate of 6.2 percentage points between 1980 and 1985 (from 16.5 to 22.7) was partitioned according to five complications of delivery recorded on hospital discharge records: previous cesarean delivery, breech presentation, dystocia, fetal distress, and all other complications. Nearly half (48 per cent) of the increase was associated with previous cesarean delivery, 29 per cent with dystocia, 16 per cent with fetal distress, 5 per cent with breech presentation, and 2 per cent with all other complications.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bodmer B., Benjamin A., McLean F. H., Usher R. H. Has use of cesarean section reduced the risks of delivery in the preterm breech presentation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Feb;154(2):244–250. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90648-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green J. E., McLean F., Smith L. P., Usher R. Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced in incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Mar 15;142(6 Pt 1):643–648. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32434-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meier P. R., Porreco R. P. Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov 15;144(6):671–678. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90436-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merrill B. S., Gibbs C. E. Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul;52(1):50–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neutra R. R., Greenland S., Friedman E. A. Effect of fetal monitoring on cesarean section rates. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):175–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Notzon F. C., Placek P. J., Taffel S. M. Comparisons of national cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 12;316(7):386–389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702123160706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paul R. H., Phelan J. P., Yeh S. Y. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):297–304. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90290-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Placek P. J., Keppel K. G., Taffel S. M., Liss T. L. Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980. Public Health Rep. 1984 Mar-Apr;99(2):173–183. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Placek P. J., Taffel S. M. The frequency of complications in cesarean and noncesarean deliveries, 1970 and 1978. Public Health Rep. 1983 Jul-Aug;98(4):396–400. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Placek P. J., Taffel S., Moien M. Cesarean section delivery rates: United States, 1981. Am J Public Health. 1983 Aug;73(8):861–862. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.8.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiono P. H., Fielden J. G., McNellis D., Rhoads G. G., Pearse W. H. Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States. JAMA. 1987 Jan 23;257(4):494–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taffel S. M., Placek P. J., Moien M. One-fifth of 1983 US births by cesarean section. Am J Public Health. 1985 Feb;75(2):190–190. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.2.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]