Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1982 May;72(5):455–463. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.5.455

A comparative study of hospice services in the United States.

R W Buckingham, D Lupu
PMCID: PMC1649785  PMID: 7065333

Abstract

In order to document the implementation of the hospice concept in the United States, 24 hospices, in operation at least one year and serving at least 100 patients, were selected from the National Hospice Organization roster to participate in a survey of organization, staffing, funding, services and population served. All of the hospices offered both home care and bereavement programs but only 41.7 per cent provided an inpatient program. Ten of the hospices were institutionally based, usually in a hospital. Inpatient services were associated with institutional affliations. The average profile of patients admitted to hospice was a 60-year-old White (89 per cent), female (54.3 per cent) cancer patient (94.5 per cent) whose spouse was primary care giver (63.8 per cent). Hospices provided a wide variety of both medical and social services provided by volunteers as well as paid staff. It appears that two divergent types of hospices are developing: 1) independent, heavily volunteer hospices with a variety of professional staff delivering a wide array of social/psychological services with unstable funding; and 2) institutionally based hospices providing both inpatient and home care, greater variety of medical/nursing services, less variety of social/psychological services, using fewer types of volunteers and paid staff, and not experiencing funding problems.

Full text

PDF
455

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amado A., Cronk B. A., Mileo R. Cost of terminal care: home hospice vs hospital. Nurs Outlook. 1979 Aug;27(8):522–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckingham R. W., 3rd, Lack S. A., Mount B. M., MacLean L. D., Collins J. T. Living with the dying: use of the technique of participant observation. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Dec 18;115(12):1211–1215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Parkes C. M. Terminal care: evaluation of in-patient service at St Christopher's Hospice. Part II. Self assessments of effects of the service on surviving spouses. Postgrad Med J. 1979 Sep;55(646):523–527. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.55.646.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES