Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1982 Aug;72(8):839–843. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.8.839

Evaluation of a continuing education program in sex therapy.

P M Sarrel, L J Sarrel, W G Faraclas
PMCID: PMC1650356  PMID: 7201251

Abstract

This paper describes a multi-dimensional, ongoing approach to evaluation in a sex therapy training program. The Yale Sex Therapy Training program agencies throughout Connecticut who would meet or surpass pre-determined standards for sex therapists. Because sex therapy is a new discipline, it was deemed essential that program evaluation be developed and carried out from the very beginnings of the program and throughout its course. Evaluative findings proved essential to monitoring the quality of teaching and supervisory efforts, in assessing change in knowledge and professional activity of trainees, and in measuring impact upon the communities served. Continuous feedback led to changes in program content and format through identification of needs and problems. The experience in the Yale program confirms the recommendations of others regarding the conduct of a continuing education program. These findings strongly imply that multi-dimensional, ongoing evaluation should be an integral component in any continuing education program.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gaston S. Nursing faculty evaluation of continuing education offerings in nursing. J Contin Educ Nurs. 1980 Mar-Apr;11(2):10–13. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-19800301-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodykoontz L. Evaluating a continuing education program. J Contin Educ Nurs. 1980 Jul-Aug;11(4):25–28. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-19800701-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green L. W. How to evaluate health promotion. Hospitals. 1979 Oct 1;53(19):106–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hauf B. J. Assuring quality in continuing nursing education. Nurs Leadersh. 1980 Mar;3(1):7–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Long L. D. The evaluation of continuing education efforts. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1969 Jun;59(6):967–973. doi: 10.2105/ajph.59.6.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Merkel S. I., McGugin M. B., Hofing A. L. Evaluation: the often neglected aspect of POR education. Superv Nurse. 1980 Oct;11(10):68–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Samek M. Quality in continuing education? Can J Public Health. 1978 Nov-Dec;69 (Suppl 1):90-1, 94-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES