Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1983 Jan;73(1):72–77. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.1.72

Non-participation in telephone follow-up interviews.

A C Marcus, C W Telesky
PMCID: PMC1650451  PMID: 6848002

Abstract

The present analysis examined sample attrition in a one-year longitudinal health survey that made use of telephone follow-up interviews (N = 1210). Overall, respondent attrition had little impact on the sociodemographic and health status characteristics of the sample at the final interview. However, certain subgroups were statistically less likely to participate in the follow-up interviews, including younger respondents, the non-employed, people from the lower socioeconomic groups, and those who initially rated their health as fair or poor. Reports of physical illness and disability obtained at the initial interview were unrelated to rates of sample attrition.

Full text

PDF
72

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aneshensel C. S., Frerichs R. R., Clark V. A., Yokopenic P. A. Telephone versus in-person surveys of community health status. Am J Public Health. 1982 Sep;72(9):1017–1021. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.9.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkanovic E., Telesky C., Reeder S. Structural and social psychological factors in the decision to seek medical care for symptoms. Med Care. 1981 Jul;19(7):693–709. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198107000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bright M. A follow-up study of the Commission on Chronic Illness morbidity survey in Baltimore. 3. Residential mobility and prospective studies. J Chronic Dis. 1969 Apr;21(11):749–759. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(69)90023-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colombotos J. Personal versus telephone interviews: effect on responses. Public Health Rep. 1969 Sep;84(9):773–782. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marcus A. C. Memory aids in longitudinal health surveys: results from a field experiment. Am J Public Health. 1982 Jun;72(6):567–573. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.6.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marcus A. C. Mode of payment as a predictor of health status, use of health services and preventive health behavior: a report from the Los Angeles Health Survey. Med Care. 1981 Oct;19(10):995–1010. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198110000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marcus A. C., Reeder L. G., Jordan L. A., Seeman T. E. Monitoring health status, access to health care, and compliance behavior in a large urban community: a report from the Los Angeles health survey. Med Care. 1980 Mar;18(3):253–265. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198003000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):238–245. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.3.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilcox N. E. Patient follow-up: procedures, technics, and devices for improvement. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1965 Nov;55(11):1741–1756. doi: 10.2105/ajph.55.11.1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yaffe R., Shapiro S., Fuchseberg R. R., Rohde C. A., Corpeno H. C. Medical economics survey-methods study: cost-effectiveness of alternative survey strategies. Med Care. 1978 Aug;16(8):641–659. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197808000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES