Abstract
During the last three years, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has conducted: 1) on-site surveys in which trained personnel visited laboratories that had experienced performance problems in the quarterly mailed proficiency testing (PT) program, reviewing the laboratories' analytical procedures by using carefully referenced samples to determine sources of errors and providing assistance in correcting them; 2) special assistance surveys in which carefully referenced samples were mailed to laboratories that had performed unsatisfactorily in routine mailed PT surveys and then telephone consultations were conducted to correct the problems; and 3) blind surveys in which carefully referenced samples were sent through normal patient sample acquisition routes to assess the actual day-to-day performance capability of the laboratories. Results suggest that on-site surveys by trained laboratory surveyors and special mailed assistance surveys can be very effective in identifying the source of analytical errors in laboratories previously found, through mailed PT surveys, to have performance problems. Blind-survey results indicate that good performance in mailed PT does not necessarily imply good laboratory performance with routine patient specimens. Although difficult to conduct, blind surveys should be conducted whenever the logistics can be worked out by contractors for laboratory services, clinicians using laboratory services, and the laboratories themselves to assure the continuation of quality service.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- LaMotte L. C., Jr, Guerrant G. O., Lewis D. S., Hall C. T. Comparison of laboratory performance with blind and mail-distributed proficiency testing samples. Public Health Rep. 1977 Nov-Dec;92(6):554–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]