Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1984 Apr;74(4):327–335. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.4.327

Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices.

N P Roos
PMCID: PMC1651480  PMID: 6703159

Abstract

This analysis focuses on the practice of hysterectomy across 33 hospital catchment areas of one Canadian province, using claims data from the Manitoba health insurance system. Hysterectomy rates varied five-fold across hospital areas. The availability of hospitals and physicians was unrelated to area rates, and there appeared to be no access barriers in the low-rate areas. High-rate areas were characterized by women who visited large numbers of different physicians and by having larger proportions of French, Polish, and Italian residents (ethnic groups which are largely Catholic in Manitoba). Although women residents of high rate areas made somewhat more visits for gynecologic problems and had many more D&Cs (dilation and curretage of the uterus), it is concluded that this may be due as much to the practice style of physicians treating patients from these areas as to gynecologic need. Residents of high and medium-high rate areas are more likely to have hysterectomy-prone surgeons as their primary physicians. Such physicians appear both more likely to "label" their patients' conditions as gynecologic in origin and more likely to advise surgical intervention (both D&C and hysterectomy) once such conditions are diagnosed. Thus, a combination of patient and physician characteristics may explain much of the variation in small area hysterectomy rates, rather than narrowly defined medical need.

Full text

PDF
327

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bloor M. J., Venters G. A., Samphier M. L. Geographical variation in the incidence of operations on the tonsils and adenoids. An epidemiological and sociological investigation (Part 2). J Laryngol Otol. 1978 Oct;92(10):883–895. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100086266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bunker J. P. Surgical manpower. A comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales. N Engl J Med. 1970 Jan 15;282(3):135–144. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197001152820306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Demlo L. K., Campbell P. M., Brown S. S. Reliability of information abstracted from patients' medical records. Med Care. 1978 Dec;16(12):995–1005. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197812000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Easterday C. L., Grimes D. A., Riggs J. A. Hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Aug;62(2):203–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kassirer J. P., Pauker S. G. The toss-up. N Engl J Med. 1981 Dec 10;305(24):1467–1469. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198112103052409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koran L. M. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Sep 25;293(13):642–646. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197509252931307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McPherson K., Strong P. M., Epstein A., Jones L. Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):273–288. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mendenhall R. C., Girard R. A., Abrahamson S. A national study of medical and surgical specialties. I. Background purpose, and methodology. JAMA. 1978 Sep 1;240(9):848–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mendenhall R. C., Lloyd J. S., Repicky P. A., Monson J. R., Girard R. A., Abrahamson S. A national study of medical and surgical specialties. II. Description of the survey instrument. JAMA. 1978 Sep 8;240(11):1160–1168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roos L. L., Jr, Roos N. P., Cageorge S. M., Nicol J. P. How good are the data? Reliability of one health care data bank. Med Care. 1982 Mar;20(3):266–276. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198203000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roos N. P., Henteleff P. D., Roos L. L., Jr A new audit prodecure applied to an old question: Is the frequency of T&A justified? Med Care. 1977 Jan;15(1):1–18. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197701000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roos N. P. Hysterectomies in one Canadian Province: a new look at risks and benefits. Am J Public Health. 1984 Jan;74(1):39–46. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roos N. P., Roos L. L., Jr Surgical rate variations: do they reflect the health or socioeconomic characteristics of the population? Med Care. 1982 Sep;20(9):945–958. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198209000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rutkow I. M., Zuidema G. D. "Unnecessary surgery": an update. Surgery. 1978 Nov;84(5):671–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Spiegel J. S., Rubenstein L. V., Scott B., Brook R. H. Who is the primary physician? N Engl J Med. 1983 May 19;308(20):1208–1212. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198305193082007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vayda E., Anderson G. D. Comparison of provincial surgical rates in 1968. Can J Surg. 1975 Jan;18(1):18-9, 22-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vayda E., Mindell W. R., Mueller C. B. Use of hypothetical cases to investigate indications for surgery. Can J Surg. 1981 Jan;24(1):19–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vayda E., Morison M., Anderson G. D. Surgical rates in the Canadian provinces, 1968 to 1972. Can J Surg. 1976 May;19(3):235–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wennberg J. E., Barnes B. A., Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(7):811–824. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90234-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wennberg J. E. Factors governing utilization of hospital services. Hosp Pract. 1979 Sep;14(9):115-21, 126-7. doi: 10.1080/21548331.1979.11707610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wennberg J. E., Fowler F. J., Jr A test of consumer contribution to small area variations in health care delivery. J Maine Med Assoc. 1977 Aug;68(8):275–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wennberg J. E., Gittelsohn A. Health care delivery in Maine I: patterns of use of common surgical procedures. J Maine Med Assoc. 1975 May;66(5):123-30, 149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982 Apr;246(4):120–134. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0482-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102–1108. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4117.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES