Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1984 Sep;74(9):979–983. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979

Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

A Fink, J Kosecoff, M Chassin, R H Brook
PMCID: PMC1651783  PMID: 6380323

Abstract

Consensus methods are being used increasingly to solve problems in medicine and health. Their main purpose is to define levels of agreement on controversial subjects. Advocates suggest that, when properly employed, consensus strategies can create structured environments in which experts are given the best available information, allowing their solutions to problems to be more justifiable and credible than otherwise. This paper surveys the characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) and provides guidelines for those who want to use the techniques. Among the concerns these guidelines address are selecting problems, choosing members for consensus panels, specifying acceptable levels of agreement, properly using empirical data, obtaining professional and political support, and disseminating results.

Full text

PDF
979

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charlton J. R., Patrick D. L., Matthews G., West P. A. Spending priorities in Kent: a Delphi study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Dec;35(4):288–292. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.4.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodale F., Gander G. W. The future of pathology: a Delphi study by pathology department chairmen. J Med Educ. 1976 Nov;51(11):897–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gustafson D. H., Delbecq A. L., Hansen M., Myers R. F. Design of a health policy research and development system for Wisconsin. Inquiry. 1975 Sep;12(3):251–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gustafson D. H., Delbecq A. L., Hansen M., Myers R. F. Design of a health policy research and development system for Wisconsin. Inquiry. 1975 Sep;12(3):251–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gustafson D. H., Delbecq A. L., Hansen M., Myers R. F. Design of a health policy research and development system for Wisconsin. Inquiry. 1975 Sep;12(3):251–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hill R. B., Goodale F. The Delphi predictions of pathology chairmen: a six-year retrospective view. J Med Educ. 1981 Jul;56(7):537–546. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198107000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jorn S. D., Williamson J. W. Statistical methods for reliability and validity testing: an application to nominal group judgments in health care. Med Care. 1977 Nov;15(11):922–928. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197711000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koplan J. P., Farer L. S. Choice of preventive treatment for isoniazid-resistant tuberculous infection. Use of decision analysis and the Delphi technique. JAMA. 1980 Dec 19;244(24):2736–2740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumaran K., Hansen R. C., Rowe M. The Delphi technique in a psychiatric hospital. Dimens Health Serv. 1976 Aug;53(8):32–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loughlin K. G., Moore L. F. Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. J Med Educ. 1979 Feb;54(2):101–106. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197902000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Milholland A. V., Wheeler S. G., Heieck J. J. Medical assessment by a Delphi group opinion technic. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jun 14;288(24):1272–1275. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197306142882405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moscovice I., Armstrong P., Shortell S., Bennett R. Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1977;2(3):388–410. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2-3-388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Perry S., Kalberer J. T., Jr The NIH consensus-development program and the assessment of health-care technologies: the first two years. N Engl J Med. 1980 Jul 17;303(3):169–172. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198007173030334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rennie D. Consensus statements. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):665–666. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomson W. A., Ponder L. D. Use of Delphi methodology to generate a survey instrument to identify priorities for state allied health associations. Allied Health Behav Sci. 1979;2(4):383–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Trivedi V. M. Measurement of task delegations among nurses by nominal group process analysis. Med Care. 1982 Feb;20(2):154–164. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198202000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health. 1972 Mar;62(3):337–342. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.3.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williamson J. W. Formulating priorities for quality assurance activity. Description of a method and its application. JAMA. 1978 Feb 13;239(7):631–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES