Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1984 Oct;74(10):1086–1092. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.10.1086

WIC participation and pregnancy outcomes: Massachusetts Statewide Evaluation Project.

M Kotelchuck, J B Schwartz, M T Anderka, K S Finison
PMCID: PMC1651877  PMID: 6476164

Abstract

The effects of WIC prenatal participation were examined using data from the Massachusetts Birth and Death Registry. The birth outcomes of 4,126 pregnant women who participated in the WIC program and gave birth in 1978 were compared to those of 4,126 women individually matched on maternal age, race, parity, education, and marital status who did not participate in WIC. WIC prenatal participants are at greater demographic risk for poor pregnancy outcomes compare to all women in the same community. WIC participation is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes, including, a decrease in low birthweight (LBW) incidence (6.9 per cent vs 8.7 per cent) and neonatal mortality (12 vs 35 deaths), an increase in gestational age (40.0 vs 39.7 weeks), and a reduction in inadequate prenatal care (3.8 per cent vs 7.0 per cent). Stratification by demographic subpopulations indicates that subpopulations at higher risk (teenage, unmarried, and Hispanic origin women) have more enhanced pregnancy outcomes associated with WIC participation. Stratification by duration of participation indicates that increased participation is associated with enhanced pregnancy outcomes. While these findings suggest that birth outcome differences are a function of WIC participation, other factors which might distinguish between the two groups could also serve as the basis for alternative explanations.

Full text

PDF
1086

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Battaglia F. C., Lubchenco L. O. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967 Aug;71(2):159–163. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(67)80066-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkenfield J., Schwartz J. B. Nutrition intervention in the community -- the "WIC" program. N Engl J Med. 1980 Mar 6;302(10):579–581. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198003063021013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edozien J. C., Switzer B. R., Bryan R. B. Medical evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Mar;32(3):677–692. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/32.3.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fitzharding P. M. Follow-up studies on the low birth weight infant. Clin Perinatol. 1976 Sep;3(2):503–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kennedy E. T., Gershoff S., Reed R., Austin J. E. Evaluation of the effect of WIC supplemental feeding on birth weight. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Mar;80(3):220–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kotch J. B., Whiteman D. Effect of a WIC program on children's clinic activity in a local health department. Med Care. 1982 Jul;20(7):691–698. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198207000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rush D. Is WIC worthwhile? Am J Public Health. 1982 Oct;72(10):1101–1103. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.10.1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES