Abstract
Minimal explicit consensus criteria in the management of patients with four indicator conditions were established by an ad hoc committee of primary care physicians practicing in different locations. These criteria were then applied to the practices of primary care physicians located in a single community by abstracting medical records and obtaining questionnaire data about patients with the indicator conditions. A standardized management score for each physician was used as the dependent variable in stepwise regression analysis with physician/practice and patient/disease characteristics as the candidate independent variables. For all physicians combined, the mean management scores were high, ranging from .78 to .93 for the four conditions. For two of the conditions, care of the normal infant and pregnant woman, the management scores were better for pediatricians and obstetricians respectively than for family physicians. For the other two conditions, adult onset diabetes and congestive heart failure, there were no differences between the management scores of family physicians and internists. Patient/disease characteristics did not contribute significantly to explaining the variation in the standardized management scores.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burdette J. A., Babineau R. A., Mayo F., Hulka B. S., Cassel J. C. Primary medical care evaluation. The AAFP-UNC collaborative study. JAMA. 1974 Dec 23;230(12):1668–1673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hulka B. S., Cassel J. C. The AAFP-UNC study of the organization, utilization, and assessment of primary medical care. Am J Public Health. 1973 Jun;63(6):494–501. doi: 10.2105/ajph.63.6.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hulka B. S., Kupper L. L., Cassel J. C., Babineau R. A. Practice characteristics and quality of primary medical care: the doctor-patient relationship. Med Care. 1975 Oct;13(10):808–820. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197510000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan D., Weiner M., Plotz C. M. Suggested criteria for the evaluation of physicians in family practice. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1975 Mar;51(3):401–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessner D. M., Kalk C. E., Singer J. Assessing health quality--the case for tracers. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jan 25;288(4):189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197301252880406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kupper L. L., Stewart J. R., Williams K. A. A note on controlling significance levels in stepwise regression. Am J Epidemiol. 1976 Jan;103(1):13–15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morehead M. A., Donaldson R. Quality of clinical management of disease in comprehensive neighborhood health centers. Med Care. 1974 Apr;12(4):301–315. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197404000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morehead M. A. The medical audit as an operational tool. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967 Sep;57(9):1643–1656. doi: 10.2105/ajph.57.9.1643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osborne C. E., Thompson H. C. Criteria for evaluation of ambulatory child health care by chart audit: development and testing of a methodology. Final report of the Joint Committee on Quality Assurance of Ambulatory Health Care for Children and Youth. Pediatrics. 1975 Oct;56(4 Pt 2 Suppl):625–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sibley J. C., Spitzer W. O., Rudnick K. V., Bell J. D., Bethune R. D., Sackett D. L., Wright K. Quality-of-care appraisal in primary care: a quantitative method. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Jul;83(1):46–52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-83-1-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]