Abstract
We report the first description of osteomyelitis due to Bartonella henselae genotype I in an immunocompetent middle-aged woman. The diagnosis was established by serology, histopathology, and PCR analysis of osseous and lymph node tissues. The mycobacteria growth indicator tube inoculated with the lymph node aspirate was used for PCR analysis.
CASE REPORT
A 62-year-old woman presented with a 2-week history of cervical column tumefaction. She complained of severe pain in the cervical column with radiation of the pain and paresthesia in both arms. She had intermittent fevers and night sweats. Her medical history included an epithelioma of the psoas treated by radiotherapy at age 49 and an endometrial carcinoma treated by surgery and radiotherapy at age 50. She was initially taking no medication. She lived in Belgium and owned about 20 cats.
Clinical examination revealed a left cervical tumefaction. The remainder of the examination, including the neurological one, revealed no abnormalities. Hemoglobin and leukocyte levels were normal. C-reactive protein level was elevated, at 12.3 mg/liter. Tumor markers were normal. HIV serology was negative. Ultrasound of the cervical tumefaction suggested a buildup of necrotic lymphadenopathies. A computed tomography scan showed the presence of a paravertebral mass with involvement of the C5 and C6 cervical vertebrae, suggestive of metastatic infiltration. In view of her past medical history, the initial diagnosis was a recurrence of her endometrial carcinoma. A needle aspiration of the cervical tumefaction was undertaken. Histological examination showed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation indicative of cat scratch disease (CSD). Serological testing done by indirect immunofluorescence on Bartonella henselae slides commercialized by Focus Technologies (Cypress, California) was positive for immunoglobulin G (IgG), with a titer at 256. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed a few days later showed spondylitis with diskitis of the C5 and C6 vertebrae, phlegmona at the same level, and left cervical lymphadenopathies suggestive of tuberculosis. A Mantoux test was negative. Chest radiography was normal. Mycobacterial cultures from the feces and the gastric liquid were made. The patient was discharged with a suspicion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. The C-reactive protein level was at 80 mg/liter, and the white blood cell count was 14.8 × 109/liter with a neutrophil count of 12.8 × 109/liter.
Diagnostic and therapeutic C5 and C6 diskectomy and arthrodesis by autograft were performed 2 weeks later. Several milliliters of pus as well as an osseous fragment of C6 were collected. Bacterial and mycobacterial cultures failed to grow any organisms. Histological examination showed granulomatous lesions indicative of CSD. PCR confirmed the presence of B. henselae DNA. Extraction was done by a commercially available DNA purification kit (Dneasy tissue kit; Qiagen, Westburg, The Netherlands). PCR with the degenerate primers CAT1 and CAT2, which enable amplification of a 414-bp fragment of the heat shock gene (htrA) of B. henselae and Bartonella quintana, was performed according to the method of Anderson et al. (1). The identity of the PCR product was checked by a Southern blot hybridization assay with probe RH1, which enables the differentiation of B. henselae and B. quintana (1). A subsequent type-specific PCR by the method of Bergmans et al. (5) revealed the presence of genotype I B. henselae. The patient received intravenous ofloxacin and clindamycin during 3 weeks. She had a favorable clinical response. Her white blood cell count returned to normal 2 weeks after surgery, and her C-reactive protein level returned to normal after 6 weeks, whereas IgG antibodies against B. henselae disappeared after 1 week. She was discharged with prescriptions for a 2-month oral therapy of ofloxacin (400 mg twice daily) and a 6-month therapy of clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily).
However, 2 months after surgery, a new tumefaction appeared in the left cervical region. Serological testing showed detectable IgG and IgM antibodies against B. henselae, with titers, respectively, at 256 and 64. The collection was localized in the same anatomical region as the previous one, and MRI showed no communication with the C5-6 arthrodesis. The collection was drained surgically. Histological examination showed remains of lymph node tissue as well as granulomatous lesions indicative of CSD. Bacteriological and mycobacteriological stains and cultures remained negative. The inoculated mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) was used for B. henselae PCR analysis, which was positive. Type-specific PCR again revealed the presence of B. henselae genotype I.
Control MRI 9 months after surgery showed a complete consolidation of the cervical autograft with no more signs of infection.
Discussion.
CSD usually presents as a self-limited lymphadenopathy following a cat scratch. Atypical presentations, such as ocular involvement, encephalopathy, hepatosplenic infection, endocarditis, or osteomyelitis, are seen in up to 14% of the cases (9, 16). Osteomyelitis associated with CSD occurs mainly in children (13, 18). So far, there have only been four reports of CSD osteomyelitis in immunocompetent adults (12, 14, 21, 22). It can affect any bones, including the vertebrae. Lymphadenopathy is usually found in association with the bone lesions, either concomitantly or after a period of several weeks. The spread of the bacteria from the inoculation site to the bone has been proposed to be hematogenous, lymphatic, or contiguous. We think that in this case, the spreading mode was contiguous from an involved cervical lymph node adjacent to the vertebral body. Most patients recover from CSD osteomyelitis and it is not clear whether antibiotics contribute to the recovery (13, 18). In our case, however, surgery had to be undertaken. The second episode of lymphadenopathy might be due to persistent cervical bacteria despite oral antibiotic therapy. It might also result from a second inoculation of B. henselae, as our patient was indeed frequently scratched by her many cats.
Most of the CSD osteomyelitis cases were reported before serological tests for B. henselae became available. As culture and isolation of B. henselae are very difficult, diagnosis was based on the presence of chronic peripheral lymphadenopathy, a history of cat exposure, a positive cat scratch skin test, and a histological examination of lymph nodes or bone tissue. Today, the skin test is no longer utilized, given the potential risk of transmitting infectious agents (2). Histopathology of the osseous and lymph node material usually reveals suppurative granulomas with central necrosis containing disintegrating neutrophils surrounded by palisading epithelioid cells and lymphocytes. In some cases, granulomas may contain central homogenous acellular material resembling the caseous necrosis encountered in M. tuberculosis infection. This picture may render the differential diagnosis with tuberculosis difficult. This is particularly problematic when clinical and radiological presentations are compatible with tuberculosis, as in our case. B. henselae serology and PCR are very useful current tools to confirm CSD osteomyelitis. Serology was positive in most of the CSD osteomyelitis cases (13, 14, 18, 21). Serology in our case was done by indirect immunofluorescence, and the cutoff values for positive serology were at a dilution of 1/128 for IgG and of 1/64 for IgM (7). Positive PCR has been reported in only two lymph nodes and in six osseous tissues of CSD osteomyelitis (6, 10, 13, 14, 17, 18, 21). In our case, we tested both the osseous and the lymph node materials. No pus aspiration from the lymph node was available for PCR. We therefore extracted the MGIT liquid medium that had been processed for mycobacterial culture. To our surprise, B. henselae PCR was positive. Since MGIT-processed media are usually kept for 42 days, such a procedure might be helpful to diagnose CSD retrospectively, when no material is available anymore. This is particularly important, given the often difficult differential diagnosis between CSD and tuberculosis and the key position of B. henselae PCR in the final diagnosis of these cases. M. tuberculosis culture is indeed positive in only 43% of lymph node tuberculosis patients (11), whereas Bartonella PCR is positive in up to 98% of CSD patients when fresh lymph nodes are analyzed (4; S. Woestyn, N. Olivé, G. Bigaignon, and M. Delmée, unpublished data).
This is the first description of CSD osteomyelitis due to B. henselae genotype I. Two genotypes based on 16S rRNA sequences have been described in uncomplicated CSD (5), and these correspond to two serotypes, Houston-1 and Marseille (15). Genotype I is more common in The Netherlands and Germany, whereas genotype II is more frequently observed in Switzerland, France, and Belgium (5, 8, 19, 23; S. Woestyn, N. Olivé, G. Bigaignon, and M. Delmée, unpublished data). Analysis of bacteremic cats showed a predominance of genotype II in The Netherlands and Germany (3, 20). On the basis of the observed opposite distribution of B. henselae variants in humans and in cats, it has been proposed that genotype I is more pathogenic for humans than genotype II. Implication of genotype I in atypical presentations of CSD such as osteomyelitis has never been studied before. Our present observations are in agreement with the hypothesis of a greater pathogenicity of genotype I B. henselae. However, this deserves further genotyping and clinical evaluation.
In conclusion, this is the first PCR detection of B. henselae genotype I from a processed MGIT culture medium observed in a case of CSD osteomyelitis.
Acknowledgments
We thank N. Olivé for technical assistance and I. P. Ochrymovicz and C. Craddock-de Burbure for revising the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Anderson, B., K. Sims, R. Regnery, L. Robinson, M. J. Schmidt, S. Goral, C. Hager, and K. Edwards. 1994. Detection of Rochalimaea henselae DNA in specimens from cat scratch disease patients by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:942-948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bass, J. W., J. M. Vincent, and D. A. Person. 1997. The expanding spectrum of Bartonella infections: II. Cat-scratch disease. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 16:163-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bergmans, A. M. C., C. M. A. De Jong, G. Van Amerongen, C. S. Schot, and L. M. Schouls. 1997. Prevalence of Bartonella species in domestic cats in The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2256-2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bergmans, A. M. C., J. W. Groothedde, J. F. P. Schellekens, J. D. A. van Embden, J. M. Ossewaarde, and L. M. Schouls. 1995. Etiology of cat scratch disease: comparison of polymerase chain reaction detection of Bartonella (formerly Rochalimaea) and Afipia felis DNA with serology and skin tests. J. Infect. Dis. 171:916-923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bergmans, A. M. C., J. F. P. Schellekens, J. D. A. van Embden, and L. M. Schouls. 1996. Predominance of two Bartonella henselae variants among cat-scratch disease patients in The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:254-260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bernini, P. M., J. T. Gorczyca, and J. F. Modlin. 1994. Cat-scratch disease presenting as a paravertebral abscess. A case report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 76:1858-1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bigaignon, G., C. Gusbin, A. Van Lint, M. Delmée, L. Boon-Falleur, T. M'Bilo, A. Aeby, P. Lepage, C. Potvliege, M. L. Delforge, C. Rossi, and B. Sztern. 1999. Apport de la recherche des anticorps anti-Bartonella henselae dans le diagnostic de la maladie des griffes de chat en Belgique. Arch. Public Health 57:287-300. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Box, A. T. A., A. Sander, I. Perschil, D. Goldenberg, and M. Altwegg. 2000. Cats are probably not the only reservoir for infections due to Bartonella henselae. J. Microbiol. Methods 27:101-102. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carithers, H. A. 1985. Cat-scratch disease. An overview based on a study of 1,200 patients. Am. J. Dis. Child. 139:1124-1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ehrenborg, C., L. Wesslén, A. Jakobson, G. Friman, and M. Holmberg. 2000. Sequence variation in the ftsZ gene of Bartonella henselae isolates and clinical samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:682-687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Geldmacher, H., C. Taube, C. Kroeger, H. Magnussen, and D. K. Kirsten. 2002. Assessment of lymph node tuberculosis in northern Germany: a clinical review. Chest 121:1177-1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gregory, D. W., and M. D. Decker. 1986. Cat scratch disease: an infection beyond the lymph node. Am. J. Med. Sci. 292:389-390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hulzebos, C. V., H. A. Koetse, J. L. L. Kimpen, and T. F. W. Wolfs. 1999. Vertebral osteomyelitis associated with cat-scratch disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28:1310-1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Krause, R., C. Wenisch, P. Fladerer, F. Daxböck, G. J. Krejs, and E. C. Reisinger. 2000. Osteomyelitis of the hip joint associated with systemic cat-scratch disease in an adult. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:781-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.La Scola, B., Z. Liang, Z. Zeaiter, P. Houpikian, P. A. D. Grimont, and D. Raoult. 2002. Genotypic characteristics of two serotypes of Bartonella henselae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2002-2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Margileth, A. M. 1993. Cat scratch disease. Adv. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 8:1-21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Modi, S. P., S. C. Eppes, and J. D. Klein. 2001. Cat-scratch disease presenting as multifocal osteomyelitis with thoracic abscess. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 20:1006-1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Robson, J. M. B., G. J. Harte, D. R. S. Osborne, and J. G. McCormack. 1999. Cat-scratch disease with paravertebral mass and osteomyelitis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28:274-278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sander, A., M. Posselt, N. Böhm, M. Ruess, and M. Altwegg. 1999. Detection of Bartonella henselae DNA by two different PCR assays and determination of the genotypes of strains involved in histologically defined cat scratch disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:993-997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sander, A., M. Ruess, S. Bereswill, M. Schuppler, and B. Steinbrueckner. 1998. Comparison of different DNA fingerprinting techniques for molecular typing of Bartonella henselae isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 10:2973-2981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Verdon, R., L. Geffray, T. Collet, H. Huet, J. J. Parienti, M. Debruyne, M. Vergnaud, and C. Bazin. 2002. Vertebral osteomyelitis due to Bartonella henselae in adults: a report of 2 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:e141-e144. [Online.] [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Wilson, J. D., and M. Castillo. 1995. Cat-scratch disease. Subtle vertebral bone marrow abnormalities demonstrated by MR imaging and radionuclide bone scan. Clin. Imaging 19:106-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zeaiter, Z., P. E. Fournier, and D. Raoult. 2002. Genomic variation of Bartonella henselae strains detected in lymph nodes of patients with cat scratch disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1023-1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
