Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1978 Nov;68(11):1090–1096. doi: 10.2105/ajph.68.11.1090

A comparative study of physicians' and nurses' conceptions of the role of the nurse practitioner.

G L Burkett, M Parken-Harris, J C Kuhn, G H Escovitz
PMCID: PMC1654016  PMID: 717617

Abstract

Attempts to define the role of the nurse practitioner as a new health care provider raise questions about the traditional health care division of labor. In order to determine nurses' and physicians' conceptions of the NP's role, parallel surveys were conducted among registered nurses and primary care physicians in southeastern Pennsylvania (including Philadelphia). Respondents (679 nurses and 597 physicians) indicated their opinions on the issue of autonomy for NPs and on the issue of specific tasks appropriate to the NP's role. There were significant differences between nurses and physicians with respect to both of the issues under consideration, but there were also important differences within each of these groups. Nurses were more likely to assert that an NP might practice independently, and also had a higher conception of the NP's capabilities. Physicians who were interested in employing a nurse practitioner had opinions which were closest to those of nurses. These findings suggest that conflict between nurses and physicians might be minimal as long as the nurse practitioner movement remains relatively small, but that there may be latent conflict inherent in any large scale attempt to change the health care division of labor at the present time.

Full text

PDF
1090

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates B. Doctor and nurse: changing roles and relations. N Engl J Med. 1970 Jul 16;283(3):129–134. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197007162830305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldsmith S. B., Johnson J. W., Jr, Lerner M. Obstetricians' attitudes toward nurse-midwives. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Sep;111(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90936-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lawrence R. S., DeFriese G. H., Putnam S. M., Pickard C. G., Cyr A. B., Whiteside S. W. Physician receptivity to nurse practitioners: a study of the correlates of the delegation of clinical responsibility. Med Care. 1977 Apr;15(4):298–310. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197704000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewis C. E., Cheyovich T. K. Who is a nurse practitioner? Processes of care and patients' and physicians' perceptions. Med Care. 1976 Apr;14(4):365–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mauksch I. G. Nursing is comming of age...through the practitioner movement. Pro:. Am J Nurs. 1975 Oct;75(10):1834-43, 1859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mauksch I. G., Young P. R. Nurse-physician interaction in a family medical care center. Nurs Outlook. 1974 Feb;22(2):113–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mereness D. Recent trends in expanding roles of the nurse. Nurs Outlook. 1970 May;18(5):30–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Merenstein J. H., Wolfe H., Barker K. M. The use of nurse practitioners in a general practice. Med Care. 1974 May;12(5):445–452. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197405000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore A. C. Nurse practitioner: reflections on the role. Nurs Outlook. 1974 Feb;22(2):124–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oseasohn R., Schweback M., Eberle B., Reid R. A. Primary care by a nurse practitioner in a rural clinic. Am J Nurs. 1975 Feb;75(2):267–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reed D. E., Roghmann K. J. Acceptability of an expanded nurse role to nurses and physicians. Med Care. 1971 Jul-Aug;9(4):372–377. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197107000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rogers M. E. Nursing is coming of age...through the practitioner movement. Con:. Am J Nurs. 1975 Oct;75(10):1834-43, 1859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rogers M. E. Nursing: to be or not to be? Nurs Outlook. 1972 Jan;20(1):42–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schorr T. M. Editorial: Is that name necessary? Am J Nurs. 1974 Feb;74(2):235–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Theiss B. E. Investigation of the perceived role functions and attitudes of the nurse practitioner role in a primary care clinic. Mil Med. 1976 Feb;141(2):85–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wright E. Registered nurses' opionions on an extended role concept. Nurs Res. 1976 Mar-Apr;25(2):112–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES