Skip to main content
Skull Base Surgery logoLink to Skull Base Surgery
. 1993 Jul;3(3):159–163. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1060580

Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis in Skull Base Surgery

Regina F Gandour-Edwards, Paul J Donald, James E Boggan
PMCID: PMC1656442  PMID: 17170907

Abstract

During January 1990 through June 1992, we performed 39 surgeries for base of skull tumors with extracranial and intracranial involvement on 33 patients. Intraoperative frozen section was requested on 581 of 904 specimens submitted (64%). There was a discrepancy between the frozen section diagnosis and final diagnosis in 15 specimens for an error rate of 3%. There were two false-positive diagnoses of malignancy and 13 false-negative diagnoses. The discrepancies were a result of sampling error in ten cases and of interpretive error in five cases. Four of the five interpretive errors involved intradural tissues. Only two of the discrepancies were clinically significant. One involved the evaluation of adequacy of surgical margins and a second involved the misinterpretation of metastatic renal cell carcinoma for hemangioblastoma. We recommend careful attention to cryostat sectioning and interpretive experience in head and neck pathology and neuropathology. The importance of vigilant communications between surgeon and pathologist before, during, and after surgery cannot be overstated. We are utilizing a video-linked microscopic network that allows the surgeon to view the frozen section histologic sections in the operating room. Future trends may include the use of monoclonal antibodies and morphometry to improve accuracy in frozen section diagnosis.

Full text

PDF
159

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dahlin D. C. Seventy-five years' experience with frozen sections at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980 Nov;55(11):721–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gandour-Edwards R. F., Donald P. J., Wiese D. A. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery: experience at a university medical center. Head Neck. 1993 Jan-Feb;15(1):33–38. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880150108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Granick M. S., Erickson E. R., Hanna D. C. Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis in salivary gland lesions. Head Neck Surg. 1985 Jul-Aug;7(6):465–467. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890070606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holaday W. J., Assor D. Ten thousand consecutive frozen sections. A retrospective study focusing on accuracy and quality control. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jun;61(6):769–777. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.6.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ikemura K., Ohya R. The accuracy and usefulness of frozen-section diagnosis. Head Neck. 1990 Jul-Aug;12(4):298–302. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880120404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Remsen K. A., Lucente F. E., Biller H. F. Reliability of frozen section diagnosis in head and neck neoplasms. Laryngoscope. 1984 Apr;94(4):519–524. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198404000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saltzstein S. L., Nahum A. M. Frozen section diagnosis: accuracy and errors; uses and abuses. Laryngoscope. 1973 Jul;83(7):1128–1143. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197307000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wheelis R. F., Yarington C. T., Jr Tumors of the salivary glands. Comparison of frozen-section diagnosis with final pathologic diagnosis. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984 Feb;110(2):76–77. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800280010004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wright J. R., Jr The development of the frozen section technique, the evolution of surgical biopsy, and the origins of surgical pathology. Bull Hist Med. 1985 Fall;59(3):295–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Skull base surgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES