Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Skull Base Surgery logoLink to Skull Base Surgery
. 2000;10(4):165–170. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9335

Advantages of the Retrosigmoid Approach in Auditory Brain Stem Implantation

Vittorio Colletti, Francesco G Fiorino, Marco Carner, Nadia Giarbini, Luca Sacchetto, Guido Cumer
PMCID: PMC1656867  PMID: 17171142

Abstract

From April 1997 to December 1999, six patients (five men and one woman), ranging in age from 22 to 37 years with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) were operated on via the classic retrosigmoid-transmental (RS-TM) approach for removal of a vestibular schwannoma (VS) (tumor size from 12 to 40 mm) and for auditory brain stem implantation (ABI). After tumor removal, the floor of the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and the convolution of the dorsal cochlear nucleos were reached, and the ABI was inserted. More recently, an ABI was implanted via the retrosigmoid approach in a 4-year-old boy with a cochlear malformation (common cavity) associated with cochlear nerve aplasia. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABRs) and neural response telemetry (NRT) were performed to verify the correct positioning of the inserted electrodes. No major complications related to ABI were observed. ABI has been activated to date in five of the NF2 patients. Auditory sensations with various numbers of electrodes were evoked in all patients. We consider the RS-TM approach the route of choice for ABI insertion in patients with NF2 and good hearing, offering a chance of hearing preservation, and in patients with complete cochlear ossification, severe head trauma and cochlear fracture, or nerve disruption, or a combination of these. A new indication for ABI implantation via the RS approach is presented by patients with bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia.

Full text

PDF
165

Images in this article

166Figure 1
on p.166
169Figure 4
on p.169

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brackmann D. E., Hitselberger W. E., Nelson R. A., Moore J., Waring M. D., Portillo F., Shannon R. V., Telischi F. F. Auditory brainstem implant: I. Issues in surgical implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jun;108(6):624–633. doi: 10.1177/019459989310800602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colletti V., Fiorino F. G. Advances in monitoring of seventh and eighth cranial nerve function during posterior fossa surgery. Am J Otol. 1998 Jul;19(4):503–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colletti V., Fiorino F. G., Carner M., Cumer G., Giarbini N., Sacchetto L. Intraoperative monitoring for hearing preservation and restoration in acoustic neuroma surgery. Skull Base Surg. 2000;10(4):187–195. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colletti V., Fiorino F. G., Carner M., Tonoli G. Mechanisms of auditory impairment during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Dec;117(6):596–605. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989770039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colletti V., Fiorino F. G. Retrosigmoid-transmeatal en bloc removal of small to medium-sized acoustic neuromas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Jan;120(1):122–128. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70382-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colletti V., Fiorino F. G., Sacchetto L. Iatrogenic impairment of hearing during surgery for acoustic neuroma. Skull Base Surg. 1996;6(3):153–161. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colletti V., Fiorino F., Mocella S., Carner M., Policante Z. "En-bloc" removal of small- to medium-sized acoustic neuromas with retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach. Skull Base Surg. 1997;7(1):31–38. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1058621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edgerton B. J., House W. F., Hitselberger W. Hearing by cochlear nucleus stimulation in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1982 Mar-Apr;91(2 Pt 3):117–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Friedland D. R., Wackym P. A. Evaluation of surgical approaches to endoscopic auditory brainstem implantation. Laryngoscope. 1999 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):175–180. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199902000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gantz B. J., McCabe B. F., Tyler R. S. Use of multichannel cochlear implants in obstructed and obliterated cochleas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Jan;98(1):72–81. doi: 10.1177/019459988809800113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harner S. G., Laws E. R., Jr Posterior fossa approach for removal of acoustic neurinomas. Arch Otolaryngol. 1981 Oct;107(10):590–593. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1981.00790460002002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hitselberger W. E., House W. F., Edgerton B. J., Whitaker S. Cochlear nucleus implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984 Feb;92(1):52–54. doi: 10.1177/019459988409200111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackler R. K., Pitts L. H. Acoustic neuroma. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1990 Jan;1(1):199–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jannetta P. J., Møller A. R., Møller M. B. Technique of hearing preservation in small acoustic neuromas. Ann Surg. 1984 Oct;200(4):513–523. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198410000-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuroki A., Møller A. R. Microsurgical anatomy around the foramen of Luschka in relation to intraoperative recording of auditory evoked potentials from the cochlear nuclei. J Neurosurg. 1995 Jun;82(6):933–939. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.6.0933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laszig R., Sollmann W. P., Marangos N., Charachon R., Ramsden R. Nucleus 20-channel and 21-channel auditory brain stem implants: first European experiences. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:28–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McElveen J. T., Jr, Hitselberger W. E., House W. F. Surgical accessibility of the cochlear nuclear complex in man: surgical landmarks. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Feb;96(2):135–140. doi: 10.1177/019459988709600204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Monsell E. M., McElveen J. T., Jr, Hitselberger W. E., House W. F. Surgical approaches to the human cochlear nuclear complex. Am J Otol. 1987 Sep;8(5):450–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montandon P. B., Boëx C., Pelizzone M. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results. Am J Otol. 1994 Nov;15(6):748–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuknecht H. F. Dysmorphogenesis of the inner ear. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1980;16(4):47–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shannon R. V., Fayad J., Moore J., Lo W. W., Otto S., Nelson R. A., O'Leary M. Auditory brainstem implant: II. Postsurgical issues and performance. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jun;108(6):634–642. doi: 10.1177/019459989310800603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Terr L. I., Fayad J., Hitselberger W. E., Zakhary R. Cochlear nucleus anatomy related to central electroauditory prosthesis implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Jun;102(6):717–721. doi: 10.1177/019459989010200615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Waring M. D. Auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus in human subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jul;96(4):338–347. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(95)00022-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Waring M. D. Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring to assist placement of auditory brain stem implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weber B. P., Lenarz T., Dillo W., Maneke I., Bertram B. Malformations in cochlear implant patients. Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S64–S65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Skull base surgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES