Meshnick notes that while “cogent evidence” is presented in our letter (R. K. Haynes, D. Monti, D. Taramelli, N. Basilico, S. Parapini, and P. Olliaro, Letter, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1175, 2003) that artemisinin does not inhibit hemozoin formation, his work was misquoted and erroneous conclusions were drawn as to how artemisinin compounds work.
Indeed, we are aware of Meshnick's demonstration of the lack of inhibition of hemozoin formation by artemisinin, and members of our group cited his results in other work (6). In our letter, the papers by Asawamahasaka et al. (Haynes et al., Letter [reference 1]), Pandey et al. (7), and our own group (Haynes et al., Letter [reference 2]) were cited together to demonstrate the problem with the hemozoin theory, whereby artemisinin would exert its antimalarial effect through heme-artemisinin adducts inhibiting heme polymerization (4, 7).
With reference to the “potent [protein] alkylating ability” in the above response, Meshnick himself nicely demonstrated that uptake of radiolabeled artemisinin into intraparasitic hemozoin constitutes 75% of total administered artemisinin; thus, heme is indeed a substantial target (3). Model studies also indicate that 85 to 90% of artemisinin forms adducts with heme (8). Thus, a correlation has been drawn between interaction of artemisinin derivatives with heme and antimalarial activity (8, 9). However, we believe we have provided conclusive evidence to support the view, shared by other authors, that these compounds cannot kill the parasite by interacting with heme. The artemisinin derivative 10-deoxodihydroartemisinin does not inhibit hemozoin formation in vitro and yet is a potent inhibitor of parasite growth (Haynes et al., Letter).
A further case against the heme activation pathway is provided by the lack of inhibition of phase I-metabolizing CYP enzymes by artemisinin, in which the prosthetic heme hydroxylates the periphery of the molecule without interfering with the trioxane nucleus (1).
A number of groups supports a nonheme iron activation process (reviewed in reference 11). Meshnick himself showed that iron chelators antagonize the antimalarial effect of artemisinin (5), a result which is not easily reconciled with a heme activation mechanism (6). Also, that the putative parasiticidal agents are “carbon-centered radicals” generated from the artemisinins by heme or iron(II) (11) is discounted on the basis that Fe(III) (formed by reductive cleavage of the peroxide) oxidizes such radicals to carbocations (2). This has been verified for antimalaria-active peroxides (10).
More work is indeed required in order to acquire a satisfactory understanding of antimalarial activity of this remarkable compound class. Nevertheless, the weight of evidence currently suggests that a specific, as yet unknown target is involved (6). It further follows that interactions of the artemisinin antimalarials with heme and free iron(II) represent competitive decomposition pathways, and thus, if it were possible to design derivatives in which degradation of the trioxane by heme or free iron(II) is inhibited, highly active derivatives would be obtained.
REFERENCES
-
1.Haynes, R. K. 2001. Artemisinin and its derivatives: the future for malaria treatment? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 14:719-726. [DOI] [PubMed]
-
2.Haynes, R. K., H.-O. Pai, and A. Voerste. 1999. Ring opening of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and dihydroartemisinin and interception of the open hydroperoxides with formation of N-oxides—a chemical model for antimalarial mode of action. Tetrahedron Lett. 40:4715-4718. [Google Scholar]
-
3.Hong, Y. L., Y. Z. Yang, and S. R. Meshnick. 1994. The interaction of artemisinin with malarial hemozoin. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 63:121-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
4.Kannan, R., D. Sahal, and V. S. Chauhan. 2002. Heme-artemisinin adducts are crucial mediators of the ability of artemisinin to inhibit heme polymerization. Chem. Biol. 9:321-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
5.Meshnick, S. R., Y. Z. Yang, V. Lima, F. Kuypers, S. Kamchonwongpaisan, and Y. Yuthavong. 1993. Iron-dependent free radical generation from the antimalarial agent artemisinin (qinghaosu). Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 37:1108-1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
6.Olliaro, P. L., R. K. Haynes, B. Meunier, and Y. Yuthavong. 2001. Possible modes of action of the artemisinin-type compounds. Trends Parasitol. 17:122-126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
7.Pandey, A. V., B. L. Tekwani, R. L. Singh, and V. S. Chauhan. 1999. Artemisinin, an endoperoxide antimalarial, disrupts the hemoglobin catabolism and heme detoxification systems in malarial parasite. J. Biol. Chem. 274:19383-19388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
8.Robert, A., J. Cazelles, and B. Meunier. 2001. Characterization of the alkylation product of heme by the antimalarial drug artemisinin. Angewandte Chem. Int. Ed. 40:1954-1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
9.Robert, A., and B. Meunier. 1998. Alkylating properties of antimalarial artemisinin derivatives and synthetic trioxanes when activated by a reduced heme model. Chem. Eur. J. 4:1287-1296. [Google Scholar]
-
10.Szpilman, A. M., E. E. Korshin, R. Hoos, G. H. Posner, and M. D. Bachi. 2001. Iron(II)-induced degradation of antimalarial sulfonyl endoperoxides. Evidence for the generation of potentially cytotoxic carbocations. J. Org. Chem. 66:6531-6540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
11.Wu., Y. K. 2002. How might qinghaosu (artemisinin) and related compounds kill the intraerythrocytic malaria parasite? A chemist's view. Acc. Chem. Res. 35:255-258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]