Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1990 Feb 24;300(6723):504–508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6723.504

Trauma services requirements in a district general hospital serving a rural area.

S J Kinny 1, D H Jones 1
PMCID: PMC1662280  PMID: 2107928

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the demands made on a regional trauma centre by a district trauma unit. DESIGN--Two part study. (1) Prospective analysis of one month's workload. (2) Retrospective analysis of one year's workload by using a computer based records system. Comparison of two sets of results. SETTING--Accident unit in Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor. PATIENTS--(1) All patients who attended the accident unit in August 1988. (2) All patients who attended the accident unit in the calendar year April 1988-April 1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Workload of a district trauma unit. RESULTS--In August 1988 there were 2325 attendances; 2302 of these were analysed. In all, 1904 attendances were for trauma; 213 patients were admitted to the trauma ward and 103 required an operation that entailed incision. Patients who attended the unit had a mean (range) injury severity score of 2-13 (0-25). Only two patients had injuries that a district general hospital would not be expected to cope with (injury severity score greater than 20). In the year April 1988-April 1989, 21,007 patients attended the unit. In all, 17,958 attendances were for orthopaedic injuries or injuries caused by an accident; 1966 patients were admitted to the unit. CONCLUSIONS--Most trauma is musculoskeletal and relatively minor according to the injury severity score. All but a few injuries can be managed in district general hospitals. In their recent report the Royal College of Surgeons has overestimated the requirements that a British district general hospital would have of a regional trauma centre.

Full text

PDF
504

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beverland D. E., Rutherford W. H. An assessment of the validity of the injury severity score when applied to gunshot wounds. Injury. 1983 Jul;15(1):19–22. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(83)90156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Christian M. S. Morbidity and mortality of car occupants: comparative survey over 24 months. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1525–1526. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Civil I. D., Schwab C. W. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1985 revision: a condensed chart for clinical use. J Trauma. 1988 Jan;28(1):87–90. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198801000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MacKenzie E. J., Shapiro S., Eastham J. N., Jr Rating AIS severity using emergency department sheets vs. inpatient charts. J Trauma. 1985 Oct;25(10):984–988. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198510000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. West J. G., Cales R. H., Gazzaniga A. B. Impact of regionalization. The Orange County experience. Arch Surg. 1983 Jun;118(6):740–744. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390060058013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES