Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1990 Mar 31;300(6728):851–853. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6728.851

A review of general practice reports: the need for standardisation.

J Wilton 1
PMCID: PMC1662572  PMID: 2337701

Abstract

Fifty general practice annual reports were reviewed with a checklist to determine how much information was commonly included and whether they described the patients, the practice, and practice activity. The reports varied widely: important information was sometimes missing, practice activity was measured in different ways, and terms were often not defined. About half the reports reviewed did not draw conclusions or suggest plans for the future. Annual reports should include comparable basic information about patients, the practice, and the practice activity to optimise their usefulness in evaluation, planning, and decision making. Many relevant data are available from family practitioner committees and district health authorities.

Full text

PDF
851

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cembrowicz S. Write a practice annual report. BMJ. 1989 Apr 8;298(6678):953–954. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6678.953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McGuinness B. W. Why not a practice annual report? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Dec;30(221):744–744. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES