Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1431–1437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6737.1431

Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment.

T W Meade 1, S Dyer 1, W Browne 1, J Townsend 1, A O Frank 1
PMCID: PMC1663160  PMID: 2143092

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To compare chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment for managing low back pain of mechanical origin. DESIGN--Randomised controlled trial. Allocation to chiropractic or hospital management by minimisation to establish groups for analysis of results according to initial referral clinic, length of current episode, history, and severity of back pain. Patients were followed up for up two years. SETTING--Chiropractic and hospital outpatient clinics in 11 centres. PATIENTS--741 Patients aged 18-65 who had no contraindications to manipulation and who had not been treated within the past month. INTERVENTIONS--Treatment at the discretion of the chiropractors, who used chiropractic manipulation in most patients, or of the hospital staff, who most commonly used Maitland mobilisation or manipulation, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Changes in the score on the Oswestry pain disability questionnaire and in the results of tests of straight leg raising and lumbar flexion. RESULTS--Chiropractic treatment was more effective than hospital outpatient management, mainly for patients with chronic or severe back pain. A benefit of about 7% points on the Oswestry scale was seen at two years. The benefit of chiropractic treatment became more evident throughout the follow up period. Secondary outcome measures also showed that chiropractic was more beneficial. CONCLUSIONS--For patients with low back pain in whom manipulation is not contraindicated chiropractic almost certainly confers worthwhile, long term benefit in comparison with hospital outpatient management. The benefit is seen mainly in those with chronic or severe pain. Introducing chiropractic into NHS practice should be considered.

Full text

PDF
1431

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management of low back pain: a feasibility study. Report of a working group. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Mar;40(1):12–17. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fairbank J. C., Couper J., Davies J. B., O'Brien J. P. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glass J. B. Acute lumbar strain: clinical signs and prognosis. Practitioner. 1979 Jun;222(1332):821–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jayson M. I. A limited role for manipulation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Dec 6;293(6560):1454–1455. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6560.1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pocock S. J., Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zinovieff A., Harborow P. R. Inclinometer for measuring straight-leg raising. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1975 May;14(2):115–115. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/14.2.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES