Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1990 Jun 9;300(6738):1525.

Intrauterine growth retardation and umbilical artery flow: Authors' Reply

Gerard Burke, Bernard Stuart, Patricia Crowley, Siobhan Ni Scanaill, John Drumm
PMCID: PMC1663200

Full text

PDF

Page 1525

1525

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Manning F. A., Lange I. R., Morrison I., Harman C. R. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):326–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Manning F. A., Morrison I., Lange I. R., Harman C. R., Chamberlain P. F. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12,620 referred high-risk pregnancies. I. Perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):343–350. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90301-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Manning F. A., Platt L. D., Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Mar 15;136(6):787–795. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90457-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Platt L. D., Walla C. A., Paul R. H., Trujillo M. E., Loesser C. V., Jacobs N. D., Broussard P. M. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Nov 15;153(6):624–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vintzileos A. M., Campbell W. A., Nochimson D. J., Weinbaum P. J. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):527–533. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90044-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES