Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To develop and report the results of a system of audit of computer records in general practice. DESIGN--A retrospective audit of records in practices using the same computer system. Information about recorded preventive procedures was collected by sending the same audit program to each practice on floppy disk. Other characteristics of the practices were determined by postal questionnaire. SETTING--Forty five general practices, widely distributed in England and Wales. SUBJECTS--All 430,901 patients registered with the practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Within each practice the percentage of patients in specified age groups for whom certain preventive procedures were recorded as having been carried out. These measures were analysed in relation to practice characteristics. RESULTS--Practice characteristics and recording rates for preventive procedures varied over a wide range. Recording rates were higher in practices with computer terminals on every doctor's desk. Only one practice achieved the new contract target of 90% coverage for recorded primary immunisations, and fewer than two thirds recorded 80% coverage for cervical cytology in the past five years. Practices holding clinics did no better than those without. Smaller partnerships and smaller doctors' list sizes were associated with better performance. CONCLUSIONS--Centrally programmed audit of computerised records is a feasible method of providing data on a regular basis for epidemiological purposes and for performance review. The fact that practices with smaller list sizes had higher levels of recorded preventive care suggests that the trend towards larger lists promoted by the new contract might militate against the intended effect of better preventive care.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Fleming D. M., Lawrence M. S. An evaluation of recorded information about preventive measures in 38 practices. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Oct;31(231):615–620. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleming D. M., Lawrence M. S., Cross K. W. List size, screening methods, and other characteristics of practices in relation to preventive care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Sep 28;291(6499):869–872. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6499.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleming D. M., Lawrence M. S. Impact of audit on preventive measures. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Dec 17;287(6408):1852–1854. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6408.1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrell D. C., Roland M. O. How can good general practitioner care be achieved? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Jan 17;294(6565):161–162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6565.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie L. D., Currie A. M. Blood pressure recording by general practitioners in north-east Scotland. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jan 8;286(6359):107–109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6359.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor M. W., Ritchie L. D., Taylor R. J., Ryan M. P., Paterson N. I., Duncan R., Brotherston K. G. General practice computing in Scotland. BMJ. 1990 Jan 20;300(6718):170–172. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6718.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkin D., Metcalfe D. H. List size and patient contact in general medical practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1501–1505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]