Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To compare ultrasonography with intravenous urography for investigating adults with proved urinary tract infection. DESIGN--Prospective study of patients presenting consecutively for radiological investigation of urinary tract infection between October 1988 and December 1989. Both investigations were performed concurrently and performed independently on routine lists by different duty radiologists, each of whom knew the details on the request form but not the findings of the other investigation. SETTING--Radiology department of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS--158 Consecutive adults (89 women, 69 men; mean age 49.7 (range 18-83)) referred from general practitioners and hospital outpatient clinics with a history of proved urinary tract infection. INTERVENTIONS--Urography and ultrasonography performed concurrently. When both examinations gave normal findings no clinical or radiological follow up was sought. All abnormal findings detected with either investigation were confirmed by subsequent imaging studies or by operative procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Accuracy of detection of abnormalities of urinary system by ultrasonography compared with urography. RESULTS--113 Patients (72%) had normal urographic and ultrasonic findings. Overall, ultrasonography concurred with the findings of urography in 149 (94%) patients, and when a single abdominal radiograph was included in the procedure, in 152 (96%). Ultrasonography missed only one important diagnosis, that of mild papillary necrosis in normal sized kidneys in a diabetic patient. It detected one early bladder tumour not visible on urography and was able to clarify the nature of renal masses (simple cysts) evident on three urograms. CONCLUSION--Ultrasonography provides a safe and accurate method of imaging the urinary tract in adults with infection. Combined with a plain abdominal radiograph, it should replace urography as the initial imaging investigation in these patients. Major savings would result from adopting this policy, and the risks to patients from ionising radiation and intravenous contrast media would be appreciably reduced.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alon U., Pery M., Davidai G., Berant M. Ultrasonography in the radiologic evaluation of children with urinary tract infection. Pediatrics. 1986 Jul;78(1):58–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booth C. M., Whiteside C. G., Milroy E. J., Turner-Warwick R. T. Unheralded urinary tract infection in the male. A clinical and urodynamic assessment. Br J Urol. 1981 Jun;53(3):270–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1981.tb06104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Lange E. E., Jones B. Unnecessary intravenous urography in young women with recurrent urinary tract infections. Clin Radiol. 1983 Sep;34(5):551–553. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(83)80158-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engel G., Schaeffer A. J., Grayhack J. T., Wendel E. F. The role of excretory urography and cystoscopy in the evaluation and management of women with recurrent urinary tract infection. J Urol. 1980 Feb;123(2):190–191. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55849-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fair W. R., McClennan B. L., Jost R. G. Are excretory urograms necessary in evaluating women with urinary tract infection? J Urol. 1979 Mar;121(3):313–315. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56766-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fidas A., Mackinlay J. Y., Wild S. R., Chisholm G. D. Ultrasound as an alternative to intravenous urography in prostatism. Clin Radiol. 1987 Sep;38(5):479–482. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(87)80128-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher E. W., Stephenson R. H. The findings reported in patients undergoing excretory urography for recurrent urinary tract infection. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Feb;25(151):146–150. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fowler J. E., Jr, Pulaski E. T. Excretory urography, cystography, and cystoscopy in the evaluation of women with urinary-tract infection: a prospective study. N Engl J Med. 1981 Feb 19;304(8):462–465. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198102193040805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gower P. E. Urinary tract infections in men. BMJ. 1989 Jun 17;298(6688):1595–1596. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6688.1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill M. C., Rich J. I., Mardiat J. G., Finder C. A. Sonography vs. excretory urography in acute flank pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Jun;144(6):1235–1238. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.6.1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanel K. T., Kroboth F. J., Schwentker F. N., Lecky J. W. The intravenous pyelogram in acute pyelonephritis. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Oct;148(10):2144–2148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis-Jones H. G., Lamb G. H., Hughes P. L. Can ultrasound replace the intravenous urogram in preliminary investigation of renal tract disease? A prospective study. Br J Radiol. 1989 Nov;62(743):977–980. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-743-977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindsell D., Moncrieff M. Comparison of ultrasound examination and intravenous urography after a urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child. 1986 Jan;61(1):81–82. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipsky B. A. Urinary tract infections in men. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 15;110(2):138–150. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-2-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lucas M. G., Bodley R. N., Lindsell D. R., Fletcher E. W., Scott N. P. Urography prior to prostatectomy. Postgrad Med J. 1986 Dec;62(734):1117–1119. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.62.734.1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Middleton W. D., Dodds W. J., Lawson T. L., Foley W. D. Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology. 1988 Apr;167(1):239–244. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.1.3279456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]