Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess the acceptability to patients of the use of patients' first names by doctors and doctors' first names by patients in general practice. DESIGN--An administered questionnaire survey. SETTING--5 General practices in Lothian. PATIENTS--475 Patients consulting 30 general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Response by patients to questionnaire on attitude to use of first names. RESULTS--Most of the patients either liked (223) or did not mind (175) being called by their first names. Only 77 disliked it, most of whom were aged over 65. Most patients (324) did not, however, want to call the doctor by his or her first name. CONCLUSIONS--General practitioners should consider using patients' first names more often, particularly with younger patients.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dunn J. J., Lee T. H., Percelay J. M., Fitz J. G., Goldman L. Patient and house officer attitudes on physician attire and etiquette. JAMA. 1987 Jan 2;257(1):65–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elizabeth J. E. Form of address: an addition to history taking? BMJ. 1989 Jan 28;298(6668):257–257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6668.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furlow T. W., Jr Clinical etiquette: a critical primer. JAMA. 1988 Nov 4;260(17):2558–2559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavin M. What doctors should call their patients. J Med Ethics. 1988 Sep;14(3):129–131. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.3.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]