Full text
PDF



Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altman D. G., Gore S. M., Gardner M. J., Pocock S. J. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 7;286(6376):1489–1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6376.1489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry G. Non-parametric confidence intervals--an extension of statistical methods. Med J Aust. 1988 Jun 6;148(11):548–548. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1988.tb93808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braitman L. E. Confidence intervals extract clinically useful information from data. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Feb;108(2):296–298. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burnham J. C. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1323–1329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1405–1408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day Nurseries Committee of the Medical Women's Federation Health of Children in Wartime Day Nurseries. Br Med J. 1946 Aug 17;2(4467):217–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dean J. W., Fowler P. B. Exaggerated responsiveness to thyrotrophin releasing hormone: a risk factor in women with coronary artery disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 May 25;290(6481):1555–1561. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6481.1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1385–1389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon B. The "top 50": a perspective on the BMJ drawn from the Science Citation Index. BMJ. 1990 Oct 3;301(6754):747–751. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6754.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas-Wilson I. Sounding board. Editorial review: peerless pronouncements. N Engl J Med. 1977 Apr 14;296(15):877–877. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197704142961514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gardner M. J., Altman D. G. Estimating with confidence. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 30;296(6631):1210–1211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6631.1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gardner M. J., Bond J. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1355–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gardner M. J., Machin D., Campbell M. J. Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 22;292(6523):810–812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilder S. World Medical Association Meets in Helsinki. Br Med J. 1964 Aug 1;2(5404):299–300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5404.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haynes R. B. Organizing and accessing the literature. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;65(6):673–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill A. B. Hugh Clegg: recollections of a great editor. BMJ. 1990 Oct 3;301(6754):752–755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6754.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lock S. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? BMJ. 1988 Dec 10;297(6662):1531–1535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6662.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lock S. Monitoring research ethical committees. BMJ. 1990 Jan 13;300(6717):61–62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6717.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lock S. Structured abstracts. BMJ. 1988 Jul 16;297(6642):156–156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6642.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mainland D. CHANCE AND THE BLOOD COUNT. Can Med Assoc J. 1934 Jun;30(6):656–658. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mainland D. PROBLEMS OF CHANCE IN CLINICAL WORK. Br Med J. 1936 Aug 1;2(3943):221–224. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.3943.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McNutt R. A., Evans A. T., Fletcher R. H., Fletcher S. W. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1371–1376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paton A. A toast to the BMJ. BMJ. 1990 Oct 3;301(6754):741-3, 755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6754.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pocock S. J., Hughes M. D., Lee R. J. Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 13;317(7):426–432. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198708133170706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards T. Marking times. BMJ. 1990 Oct 3;301(6754):744–746. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6754.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rümke C. L. Betrouwbaarheidsintervallen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1989 Oct 14;133(41):2013–2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

