Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2004 Feb 1;554(Pt 3):592. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.057224

Functional markers and the ‘homogeneity’ of human mesenchymal stem cells

Kenneth R Boheler 1
PMCID: PMC1664800  PMID: 14634205

Stem cells are characterized by the abilities to self-renew, generate large numbers of progeny and differentiate into at least one mature cell type. Bone marrow serves as a reservoir for several classes of adult stem cells. In addition to haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which can reconstitute the haematopoietic system of a myeloablated host, bone marrow contains a diverse population of marrow stromal cells (Herzog et al. 2003). Included among these are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which ex vivo can be isolated as a relatively homogeneous and undifferentiated cell population that produces multiple mature cell types including fat, bone and cartilage (Pittenger et al. 1999). Under appropriate, but ill-defined conditions, human MSCs (hMSCs) can also differentiate into other cell types, including excitable cells with neuronal-, myogenic and cardiomyogenic-like phenotypes. Because MSCs are multipotent and readily expandable in vitro, these cells have already been employed in early clinical studies, including the treatment of human myocardial infarction. Transplantation of autologous or allogeneic MSCs therefore represents a novel form of cellular therapy, which shows substantial promise for the treatment of a number of human diseases.

A number of fundamental questions relating to the biology of undifferentiated MSCs remain unanswered. These involve the homogeneity of the cells used for therapy, the best way of introducing (local or systemic) the cells for therapeutics, the survival and homing capacity of the cells to host tissues following transplantation, and the differentiation potential of these cells in vitro versus in vivo. Ultimately, scientists and clinicians must demonstrate that MSCs and their derivatives function in a normal physiological way in vivo.

In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Heubach et al. (2004) have begun the early and critical electrophysiological characterizations of undifferentiated hMSCs. This study lays the groundwork for the identification of functional markers prior to and following differentiation of hMSCs both in vitro and in vivo. Heubach et al. have identified and characterized several inward and outward cell currents typically present in a ‘homogeneous’ population of MSCs obtained either from primary cell isolates or from a commercial source. The authors demonstrate the presence of two outward currents (Ir and Is) in the majority of hMSCs, and the Ir current was further characterized as a large-conductance voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ current. Inward currents were, however, only present in a subpopulation of hMSCs. Even though cells employed in this study were considered relatively homogeneous (CD29+, CD105+, CD166+, CD34−− and CD45−/lo), the finding that hMSCs displayed a mixed distribution of channels argues for a heterogeneous cell population. Specifically, the l-type Ca2+ channel, which is critical for excitation–contraction coupling mechanisms in adult heart, was only found at a low frequency in hMSCs. Similarly, Kawano et al. previously demonstrated that store-operated Ca2+ currents could be recorded in a majority of cells, but that only 15% of hMSCs demonstrated a dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium current typical of l-type calcium channels (Kawano et al. 2002).

Since we know that some MSCs can form heart cells, do subpopulations of hMSCs or epigenetic modifications of hMSCs in culture permit differentiation to excitable cell (cardiac) precursors? A cardiomyogenic cell line has previously been established by culturing marrow stromal cells from mice in the presence of the DNA demethylation agent 5-azacytidine, showing that epigenetic modifications can be crucial to the formation of cardiomyocytes (Makino et al. 1999). Alternatively, the identification of small numbers of cells that express distinct patterns of ion channels argues for the presence of poorly defined precursor/stem cell populations or differentiated cells in hMSC cultures. In this regard, it would be useful to extend the present study to test for the presence of connexins (Cx40, 43 and 45) and functional gap junctions. Oyamada et al. previously showed that undifferentiated embryonic stem cells express gap junctions (Oyamada et al. 1996), and several groups have shown that gap junctions are important for the differentiation process to cardiomyocytes. The presence of gap junctions in a subpopulation of hMSCs might argue for the presence of an excitable cell precursor.

Finally, the development of clonal assays and cell sorter-based separation techniques proved critical to the isolation of candidate stem cell populations from the haematopoietic system of mice. These advances ultimately led to the identification of two classes of multipotent cells – long-term and short-term reconstitutive HSCs and to the delineation of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell lineage hierarchies (Weissman et al. 2001). This in turn led to important medical advances in cancer therapy, transplantation and autoimmunity. Multipotent hMSCs have been isolated in clonal assays, but the isolated clones did not differentiate with an equal degree of plasticity (Pittenger et al. 1999). Together with the current functional findings of Heubach et al. (2004) these results suggest that unique subpopulations may be present in hMSC cultures that preferentially differentiate to selected mature cell types. Clearly, further basic research is required, and the use of cell surface or functional markers may prove critical to this evaluation. Only after we have a better understanding of the basic mechanisms and the specific cells required for directed differentiation will we be able to fully exploit hMSC multipotentiality for therapeutic purposes.

References

  1. Herzog EL, Chai L, Krause DS. Blood. 2003;102:3483–3493. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Heubach JF, Graf EM, Leutheuser J, Bock M, Balana B, Zahanich I, Christ T, Boxberger S, Wettwer E, Ravens U. J Physiol. 2004;554:659–672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kawano S, Shoji S, Ichinose S, Yamagata K, Tagami M, Hiraoka M. Cell Calcium. 2002;32:165–174. doi: 10.1016/s0143416002001240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Makino S, Fukuda K, Miyoshi S, Konishi R, Kodama H, Pan J, Sano M, Takahashi T, Hori S, Abe H, Hata J, Umezawa A, Ogawa S. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:697–705. doi: 10.1172/JCI5298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Oyamada Y, Komatsu K, Kimura H, Mori M, Oyamada M. Exp Cell Res. 1996;229:318–326. doi: 10.1006/excr.1996.0377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Science. 1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Weissman IL, Anderson DJ, Gage F. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:387–403. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES