Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1972 Nov;46(3):498–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1972.tb08147.x

The mechanism of the facilitatory action of edrophonium in cat skeletal muscle

L C Blaber
PMCID: PMC1666521  PMID: 4144241

Abstract

1. The effects of edrophonium have been observed in the transversely cut tenuissimus muscle of the cat.

2. Concentrations of edrophonium 10-7M to 10-5M increased the amplitude of the end-plate potential (e.p.p.) but produced no greater increase in time course than previously observed in curarized muscle.

3. When the e.p.p. and gross nerve action potential were recorded simultaneously, antidromic discharges were observed in the motor nerve concomitantly with repetitive e.p.ps in the presence of edrophonium.

4. Edrophonium produced no effect on the input resistance or equilibrium potential of the end-plate.

5. The fractional release of transmitter was significantly increased by edrophonium but there was no increase in the quantal release of transmitter in the transversely cut muscle preparation.

6. In curarized muscle edrophonium also increased the quantal release, the size of the available store of transmitter and the rate of refilling of the available store.

7. It is concluded that edrophonium facilitates transmission to skeletal muscle by inducing a repetitive antidromic discharge in the nerve, following orthodromic stimulation. The antidromic discharge propagates by axon reflex to other nerve terminals of the same motor unit producing repetitive e.p.ps. It is also suggested that edrophonium antagonizes tubocurarine by acting as a partial agonist at the motor nerve terminal.

Full text

PDF
498

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLABER L. C., BOWMAN W. C. A comparison between the effects of edrophonium and choline in the skeletal muscles of the cat. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1959 Dec;14:456–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1959.tb00949.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLABER L. C., BOWMAN W. C. Studies on the repetitive discharges evoked in motor nerve and skeletal muscle after injection of anticholinesterase drugs. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963 Apr;20:326–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01472.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOYD I. A., MARTIN A. R. Membrane constants of mammalian muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;147:450–457. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BOYD I. A., MARTIN A. R. The end-plate potential in mammalian muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Apr 27;132(1):74–91. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barstad J. A., Lilleheil G. Transversaly cut diaphragm preparation from rat. An adjuvant tool in the study of the physiology and pbarmacology of the myoneural junction. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1968 Oct;175(2):373–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blaber L. C., Christ D. D. The action of facilitatory drugs on the isolated tenuissimus muscle of the cat. Int J Neuropharmacol. 1967 Nov;6(6):473–484. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(67)90047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blaber L. C., Goode J. W. A comparison of the action of facilitatory and depolarizing drugs at the mammalian motor nerve terminal. Int J Neuropharmacol. 1968 Sep;7(5):429–440. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(68)90042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blaer L. C. The effect of facilitatory concentrations of decamethonium on the storage and release of transmitter at the neuromuscular junction of the cat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1970 Dec;175(3):664–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elmqvist D., Quastel D. M. A quantitative study of end-plate potentials in isolated human muscle. J Physiol. 1965 Jun;178(3):505–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUBBARD J. I., SCHMIDT R. F. An electrophysiological investigation of mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:145–167. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUBBARD J. I., SCHMIDT R. F. Stimulation of motor nerve terminals. Nature. 1961 Sep 9;191:1103–1104. doi: 10.1038/1911103a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hubbard J. I., Wilson D. F., Miyamoto M. Reduction of transmitter release by D-tubocurarine. Nature. 1969 Aug 2;223(5205):531–533. doi: 10.1038/223531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JONES J. J., LAITY J. L. A NOTE ON AN UNUSUAL EFFECT OF GALLAMINE AND TUBOCURARINE. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1965 Apr;24:360–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1965.tb01723.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacobs R. S., Blaber L. C. The anti-curare action of sodium fluoride at the neuromuscular junction of cat tenuissimus muscle. Neuropharmacology. 1971 Sep;10(5):607–612. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(71)90026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. On the factors which determine the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):267–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. KUPERMAN A. S., OKAMOTO M. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANICURARE ACTIVITY AND TIME COURSE OF THE ENDPLATE POTENTIAL; A STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY APPROACH. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1964 Dec;23:575–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01611.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz B., Miledi R. The effect of prolonged depolarization on synaptic transfer in the stellate ganglion of the squid. J Physiol. 1971 Jul;216(2):503–512. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katz B., Miledi R. The release of acetylcholine from nerve endings by graded electric pulses. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1967 Jan 31;167(1006):23–38. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1967.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RANDIC M., STRAUGHAN D. W. ANTIDROMIC ACTIVITY IN THE RAT PHRENIC NERVE-DIAPHRAGM PREPARATION. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:130–148. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. RIKER W. F., Jr, ROBERTS J., STANDAERT F. G., FUJIMORI H. The motor nerve terminal as the primary focus for drug-in-duced facilitation of neuromuscular transmission. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1957 Nov;121(3):286–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. STANDAERT F. G. POST-TETANIC REPETITIVE ACTIVITY IN THE CAT SOLEUS NERVE. ITS ORIGIN, COURSE, AND MECHANISM OF GENERATION. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Sep;47:53–70. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Active phase of frog's end-plate potential. J Neurophysiol. 1959 Jul;22(4):395–411. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. WERNER G. Generation of antidromic activity in motor nerves. J Neurophysiol. 1960 Jul;23:453–461. doi: 10.1152/jn.1960.23.4.453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WILSON I. B. The interaction of tensilon and neostigmine with acetylcholinesterase. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1955 Dec 1;104(2):204–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES