Abstract
1 The depolarization of frog endplate by a brief iontophoretic application of decamethonium was slower in time course than the inhibition of a long carbachol response produced by the same decamethonium pulse, or than the excitation produced by a brief equipotent carbachol pulse. 2 The delay between the peak inhibition and peak excitation produced by decamethonium, about 50 ms, is too great to be explained by slow receptor activation kinetics, since Katz & Miledi (1973) have shown that the lifetime of decamethonium-activated receptors is only 0.25 milliseconds. 3 If doses of carbachol and decamethonium are adjusted to give response amplitudes in the ratio corresponding to the ratio of their presumed maximum responses, then there is little difference in the time courses of the responses. 4 This observation, together with the finding that increasing the dose applied slows the decamethonium response much more than the carbachol response, suggests that a decamethonium response contains contributions from a much wider area of receptive membrane than does a carbachol response of equal amplitude. 5 Simulation shows that these geometrical effects are sufficient to account for the rapidity of inhibition compared to excitation without postulating slow receptor kinetics. 6 It is pointed out that similar effects may account for certain results obtained in iontophoretic studies of desensitization.
Full text
PDF






Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adams P. R. A study of desensitization using voltage clamp. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):135–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00580536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams P. R. An analysis of the dose-response curve at voltage-clamped frog-endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):145–153. doi: 10.1007/BF00580537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams P. R. Drug interactions at the motor endplate. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):155–164. doi: 10.1007/BF00580538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams P. R. Proceedings: A comparison of the rate of onset of excitation and inhibition by decamethonium acting at frog endplate receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1974 May;51(1):132P–133P. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. A comparison of acetylcholine and stable depolarizing agents. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):362–368. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):369–381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. On the localization of acetylcholine receptors. J Physiol. 1955 Apr 28;128(1):157–181. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz B., Miledi R. The characteristics of 'end-plate noise' produced by different depolarizing drugs. J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):707–717. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1970 Jul;6(4):357–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waud D. R. The rate of action of competitive neuromuscular blocking agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1967 Oct;158(1):99–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
