Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1979 Apr;65(4):701–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1979.tb07884.x

The action of microelectrophoretically applied (3,4-dihydroxy-phenylamino)-2-imidazoline (DPI) on single cortical neurones.

P Bevan, C M Bradshaw, R Y Pun, N T Slater, E Szabadi
PMCID: PMC1668660  PMID: 435693

Abstract

1. The technique of microelectrophoresis was used in order to compare the actions of the imidazoline derivative, (3,4-dihydroxy-phenylamino)-2-imidazoline (DPI), with those of dopamine and phenylephrine on single neurones in the cerebral cortex of the rat anaesthetized with halothane. 2. DPI and phenylephrine were almost exclusively excitatory, whereas dopamine could evoke both excitatory and depressant responses. 3. In the case of excitatory responses, DPI appeared to be more potent than dopamine, and was approximately equipotent with phenylephrine. 4. The dopamine antagonist, haloperidol, could discriminate between excitatory responses to DPI and dopamine: responses to dopamine were abolished, whereas responses to DPI, and to a control agonist, acetylcholine, were unaffected. 5. The alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, phenoxybenzamine, antagonized equally excitatory responses to DPI and phenylephrine. Responses to acetylcholine were not affected. 6. It is concluded that DPI does not stimulate dopamine receptors on cortical neurones; the excitatory responses of these cells to DPI may be mediated by alpha-adrenoceptors.

Full text

PDF
701

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bevan P., Bradshaw C. M., Pun R. Y., Slater N. T., Szabadi E. Responses of single cortical neurones to noradrenaline and dopamine. Neuropharmacology. 1978 Aug;17(8):611–617. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(78)90156-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bevan P., Bradshaw C. M., Roberts M. H., Szabadi E. The effect of microelectrophoretically applied mescaline on cortical neurones. Neuropharmacology. 1974 Nov;13(10-11):1033–1045. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(74)90094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bevan P., Bradshaw C. M., Szabadi E. Effects of iprindole on responses of single cortical and caudate neurones to monoamines and acetylcholine. Br J Pharmacol. 1975 Sep;55(1):17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1975.tb07605.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bevan P., Bradshaw C. M., Szabadi E. The pharmacology of adrenergic neuronal responses in the cerebral cortex: evidence for excitatory alpha- and inhibitory beta-receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1977 Apr;59(4):635–641. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1977.tb07732.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bradshaw C. M., Roberts M. H., Szabadi E. Kinetics of the release of noradrenaline from micropipettes: interaction between ejecting and retaining currents. Br J Pharmacol. 1973 Dec;49(4):667–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb08543.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradshaw C. M., Szabadi E., Roberts M. H. The reflection of ejecting and retaining currents in the time-course of neuronal responses to microelectrophoretically applied drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1973 Jul;25(7):513–520. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1973.tb09150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bunney B. S., Aghajanian G. K. Dopamine and norepinephrine innervated cells in the rat prefrontal cortex: pharmacological differentiation using microiontophoretic techniques. Life Sci. 1976 Dec 1;19(11):1783–1789. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(76)90087-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cools A. R., Boudier A. J., Rossum J. M. Dopamine receptors: selective agonists and antagonists of functionally distinct types within the feline brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1976 Jun;37(2):283–293. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(76)90036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharma J. N. Microiontophoretic application of some monoamines and their antagonists to cortical neurones of the rat. Neuropharmacology. 1977 Feb;16(2):83–88. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(77)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stone T. W. Responses of neurones in the cerebral cortex and caudate nucleus to amantadine, amphetamine and dopamine. Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Jan;56(1):101–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb06964.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Struyker Boudier H., Teppema L., Cools A., Van Rossum J. (3,4-Dihydroxy-phenylamino)-2-imidazoline (DPI), a new potent agonist at dopamine receptors mediating neuronal inhibition. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1975 Nov;27(11):882–883. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1975.tb10240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Szabadi E., Bradshaw C. M. The role of physical and biological factors in determining the time course of neuronal responses. Neuropharmacology. 1974 Jun;13(6):537–545. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(74)90143-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES