Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1495–1497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6791.1495

Can computer aided teaching packages improve clinical care in patients with acute abdominal pain?

F T de Dombal 1, V Dallos 1, W A McAdam 1
PMCID: PMC1670180  PMID: 1855017

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To compare three methods of support for inexperienced staff in their diagnosis and management of patients with acute abdominal pain--namely, with (a) structured data collection forms, (b) real time computer aided decision support, and (c) computer based teaching packages. DESIGN--Prospective assessment of effects of methods of support on groups of doctors in one urban hospital and one rural hospital. SETTING--Accident and emergency department at Whipps Cross Hospital, London, and surgical wards of Airedale General Hospital, West Yorkshire. PATIENTS--Consecutive prospective series of all patients presenting to each hospital in specified time periods with acute abdominal pain; total patients in the various periods were 12,506. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Diagnostic accuracy of participating doctors, admission rates of patients with non-specific abdominal pain, perforation rates in patients with appendicitis, negative laparotomy rates. RESULTS--Use of any one modality resulted in improved diagnostic accuracy and decision making performance. Use of structured forms plus computer feedback resulted in better performance than use of forms alone. Use of structured forms plus a computer teaching package gave results at least as good as those with direct feedback by computer. CONCLUSIONS--The results confirm earlier studies in suggesting that the use of computer aided decision support improves diagnostic and decision making performance when dealing with patients suffering from acute abdominal pain. That use of the computer for teaching gave results at least as good as with its use for direct feedback may be highly relevant for those who are apprehensive about the real time use of diagnostic computers in a clinical setting.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams I. D., Chan M., Clifford P. C., Cooke W. M., Dallos V., de Dombal F. T., Edwards M. H., Hancock D. M., Hewett D. J., McIntyre N. Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 27;293(6550):800–804. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6550.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balla J. I., Elstein A. S., Christensen C. Obstacles to acceptance of clinical decision analysis. BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):579–582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clifford P. C., Chan M., Hewett D. J. The acute abdomen: management with microcomputer aid. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986 Jul;68(4):182–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gunn A. A. The diagnosis of acute abdominal pain with computer analysis. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1976 May;21(3):170–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hoffmann J., Rasmussen O. O. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):774–779. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leaper D. J., Gill P. W., Staniland J. R., Horrocks J. C., de Dombal F. T. Clinical diagnostic process: an analysis. Br Med J. 1973 Sep 15;3(5880):569–574. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5880.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McAdam W. A., Brock B. M., Armitage T., Davenport P., Chan M., de Dombal F. T. Twelve years' experience of computer-aided diagnosis in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Mar;72(2):140–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morris F., Cope A., Hawes S. Training in accident and emergency: views of senior house officers. BMJ. 1990 Jan 20;300(6718):165–166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6718.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schwartz D., Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis. 1967 Aug;20(8):637–648. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Staniland J. R., Ditchburn J., De Dombal F. T. Clinical presentation of acute abdomen: study of 600 patients. Br Med J. 1972 Aug 12;3(5823):393–398. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5823.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Dombal F. T., Leaper D. J., Staniland J. R., McCann A. P., Horrocks J. C. Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J. 1972 Apr 1;2(5804):9–13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5804.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Dombal F. T. The OMGE acute abdominal pain survey. Progress report, 1986. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1988;144:35–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES