Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess general practitioners' decisions to request lumbar spine radiographs according to the guidelines of the Royal College of Radiologists. DESIGN--Prospective questionnaire survey of outpatients attending for lumbar spine radiography. SETTING--London community hospital. SUBJECTS--100 consecutive adult outpatients attending for lumbar spine radiography at their general practitioner's request. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Patient's history and clinical signs; radiological diagnosis; change in management of patients with significant radiological abnormality in response to the radiologist's report. RESULTS--60 patients were aged between 18 and 45, 27 (45%) of whom were women. Five patients were fully examined by their doctor before radiographs were requested, 76 were partially examined, and 19 were not examined. In 37 patients the examinations showed radiologically normal findings; 30 had radiologically significant disc or degenerative disease. Pain score and radiological diagnosis was not correlated (6.43 (range 1-10) for patients with significant disease v 6.14 (range 1-10) for those without, p greater than 0.05). There were no cases of malignancy or infection. One patient with radiologically significant disease was referred to a hospital specialist, and the management of only two such patients was altered by the report. 52 of the examinations should not have been requested if the guidelines had been strictly applied. CONCLUSIONS--There is a need to inform doctors of the efficacy of radiological examinations. An awareness of the college's guidelines among general practitioners should be actively promoted by radiologists.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Butt W. P. Radiology for back pain. Clin Radiol. 1989 Jan;40(1):6–10. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(89)80004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costs and benefits of skull radiography for head injury. A national study by the Royal College of Radiologists. Lancet. 1981 Oct 10;2(8250):791–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edelstyn G. A., Gillespie P. J., Grebbell F. S. The radiological demonstration of osseous metastases. Experimental observations. Clin Radiol. 1967 Apr;18(2):158–162. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(67)80010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fowkes F. G., Davies E. R., Evans K. T., Green G., Hugh A. E., Nolan D. J., Power A. L., Roberts C. J., Roylance J. Compliance with the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on the use of pre-operative chest radiographs. Clin Radiol. 1987 Jan;38(1):45–48. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(87)80399-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fowkes F. G., Evans R. C., Williams L. A., Gehlbach S. H., Cooke B. R., Roberts C. J. Implementation of guidelines for the use of skull radiographs in patients with head injuries. Lancet. 1984 Oct 6;2(8406):795–796. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90715-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelen G. D., Noji E. K., Doris P. E. Guidelines for use of lumbar spine radiography. Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Mar;15(3):245–251. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80556-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson R. Radiography in women of childbearing ability. BMJ. 1989 Nov 11;299(6709):1175–1176. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6709.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quinet R. J., Hadler N. M. Diagnosis and treatment of backache. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1979 May;8(4):261–287. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(79)90005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waddell G. An approach to backache. Br J Hosp Med. 1982 Sep;28(3):187, 190-1, 193-4, passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]