Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1435–1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1435

Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the neurosciences.

A K Szczepura 1, J Fletcher 1, J D Fitz-Patrick 1
PMCID: PMC1671680  PMID: 1819260

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To measure, in a service setting, the effect of magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis, diagnostic certainty, and patient management in the neurosciences; to measure the cost per patient scanned; to estimate the marginal cost of imaging and compare this with its diagnostic impact; to measure changes in patients' quality of life; and to record the diagnostic pathway leading to magnetic resonance imaging. DESIGN--Controlled observational study using questionnaires on diagnosis and patient management before and after imaging. Detailed costing study. Quality of life questionnaires at the time of imaging and six months later. Diagnostic pathways extracted from medical records for a representative sample. SETTING--Regional superconducting 1.5 T magnetic resonance service. SUBJECTS--782 consecutive neuroscience patients referred by consultants for magnetic resonance imaging during June 1988-9; diagnostic pathways recorded for 158 cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Costs of magnetic resonance imaging and preliminary investigations; changes in planned management and resulting savings; changes in principal diagnosis and diagnostic certainty; changes in patients' quality of life. RESULTS--Average cost of magnetic resonance imaging was estimated at 206.20/patient pounds (throughput 2250 patients/year, 1989-90 prices including contrast and upgrading). Before magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic procedures cost 164.40/patient pounds (including inpatient stays). Management changed after imaging in 208 (27%) cases; saving an estimated 80.90/patient pounds. Confidence in planned management increased in a further 226 (29%) referrals. Consultants' principal diagnosis changed in 159 of 782 (20%) referrals; marginal cost per diagnostic change was 626 pounds. Confidence in diagnosis increased in 236 (30%) referrals. No improvement in patients' quality of life at six month assessment. CONCLUSIONS--Any improvement in diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging is achieved at a higher cost. Techniques for monitoring the cost effectiveness of this technology need to be developed.

Full text

PDF
1435

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bydder G. M. Magnetic resonance imaging: present status and future perspectives. Br J Radiol. 1988 Oct;61(730):889–897. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-61-730-889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cherryman G. R. Cost of operating a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging system. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Nov 16;291(6506):1437–1438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6506.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper L. S., Chalmers T. C., McCally M., Berrier J., Sacks H. S. The poor quality of early evaluations of magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA. 1988 Jun 10;259(22):3277–3280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dixon A. K., Southern J. P., Teale A., Freer C. E., Hall L. D., Williams A., Sims C. Magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine: effective for the clinician or the patient? BMJ. 1991 Jan 12;302(6768):79–82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6768.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durick D. A., Phillips M. L. Diffusion of an innovation: adoption of MRI. Radiol Technol. 1988 Jan-Feb;59(3):239–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evens R. G., Evens R. G., Jr Analysis of economics and use of MR imaging units in the United States in 1990. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Sep;157(3):603–607. doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.3.1872246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Evens R. G., Evens R. G., Jr Economic and utilization analysis of MR imaging units in the United States in 1987. Radiology. 1988 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):27–30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fineberg H. V., Bauman R., Sosman M. Computerized cranial tomography. Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans. JAMA. 1977 Jul 18;238(3):224–227. doi: 10.1001/jama.238.3.224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kent D. L., Larson E. B. Diagnostic technology assessments: problems and prospects. Ann Intern Med. 1988 May;108(5):759–761. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-5-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kent D. L., Larson E. B. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. Is clinical efficacy established after the first decade? Ann Intern Med. 1988 Mar;108(3):402–424. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-3-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Larson E. B., Kent D. L. The relevance of socioeconomic and health policy issues to clinical research. The case of MRI and neuroradiology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(2):195–206. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300006425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pribyl S. Demand forecasting and targeting of MRI services. Appl Radiol. 1988 May;17(5):29–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shuman W. P. The poor quality of early evaluations of MR imaging: a reply. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Nov;151(5):857–858. doi: 10.2214/ajr.151.5.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stilwell J. A. The costs of X rays. Br J Radiol. 1984 Jul;57(679):647–649. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-57-679-647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Szczepura A. K., Stilwell J. A. Information for decision makers at hospital laboratory level: an example of a graphical method of representing costs and effects for a replacement automated technology in a haematology laboratory. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(7):715–725. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES