Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1991 Dec 14;303(6816):1517–1519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6816.1517

Outcome of planned home births in an inner city practice.

C Ford 1, S Iliffe 1, O Franklin 1
PMCID: PMC1671830  PMID: 1782494

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the outcome of pregnancy for women booking for home births in an inner London practice between 1977 and 1989. DESIGN--Retrospective review of practice obstetric records. SETTING--A general practice in London. SUBJECTS--285 women registered with the practice or referred by neighbouring general practitioners or local community midwives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Place of birth and number of cases transferred to specialist care before, during, and after labour. RESULTS--Of 285 women who booked for home births, eight left the practice area before the onset of labour, giving a study population of 277 women. Six had spontaneous abortions, 26 were transferred to specialist care during pregnancy, another 26 were transferred during labour, and four were transferred in the postpartum period. 215 women (77.6%, 95% confidence interval 72.7 to 82.5) had normal births at home without needing specialist help. Transfer to specialist care during pregnancy was not significantly related to parity, but nulliparous women were significantly more likely to require transfer during labour (p = 0.00002). Postnatal complications requiring specialist attention were uncommon among mothers delivered at home (four cases) and rare among their babies (three cases). CONCLUSIONS--Birth at home is practical and safe for a self selected population of multiparous women, but nulliparous women are more likely to require transfer to hospital during labour because of delay in labour. Close cooperation between the general practitioner and both community midwives and hospital obstetricians is important in minimising the risks of trial of labour at home.

Full text

PDF
1517

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balla J. I., Elstein A. S., Christensen C. Obstacles to acceptance of clinical decision analysis. BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):579–582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6673.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett J. F., Jarvis G. J., Macdonald H. N., Buchan P. C., Tyrrell S. N., Lilford R. J. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics. Lancet. 1990 Sep 1;336(8714):549–551. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryce F. C., Clayton J. K., Rand R. J., Beck I., Farquharson D. I., Jones S. E. General practitioner obstetrics in Bradford. BMJ. 1990 Mar 17;300(6726):725–727. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell R., Davies I. M., Macfarlane A., Beral V. Home births in England and Wales, 1979: perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 22;289(6447):721–724. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6447.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chamberlain G. The place of birth--striking a balance. Practitioner. 1988 Jul;232(1452):771–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dixon E. A. Review of maternity patients suitable for home delivery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Jun 12;284(6331):1753–1755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6331.1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jewell D. General practitioner obstetrics. BMJ. 1989 Mar 18;298(6675):690–691. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6675.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lilford R. J. Clinical experimentation in obstetrics. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Nov 21;295(6609):1298–1300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6609.1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Loudon I. Obstetrics and the general practitioner. BMJ. 1990 Oct 3;301(6754):703–707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6754.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marsh G. N., Channing D. M. Audit of 26 years of obstetrics in general practice. BMJ. 1989 Apr 22;298(6680):1077–1080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ryan T. D., Kidd G. M. Maternal morbidity associated with in utero transfer. BMJ. 1989 Dec 2;299(6712):1383–1385. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6712.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sangala V., Dunster G., Bohin S., Osborne J. P. Perinatal mortality rates in isolated general practitioner maternity units. BMJ. 1990 Sep 1;301(6749):418–420. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6749.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tew M. Place of birth and perinatal mortality. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Aug;35(277):390–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES