Abstract
Viruses are used to test the barrier properties of materials. Binding of virus particles during passage through holes in the material may yield misleading test results. The choices of challenge virus and suspending medium may be important for minimizing confounding effects that might arise from such binding. In this study, different surrogate viruses, as well as different support media, were evaluated to determine optimal test parameters. Two membranes with high-binding properties (nitrocellulose and cationic polysulfone) were used as filters to compare binding activities of different surrogate challenge viruses (MS2, phi X174, T7, PRD1, and phi 6) in different media. The media consisted of buffered saline with surfactants, serum, or culture broth as additives. In addition, elution rates of viruses that bound to the membranes were determined. The results suggest that viruses can bind by hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions, with phi X174 displaying the lowest level of binding by either process. The nonionic detergents Triton X-100 and Tween 80 (0.1%) equally minimized hydrophobic interactions. Neither anionic nor cationic surfactants were as effective at nontoxic levels. Serum was effective at reducing both hydrophobic and electrostatic binding, with 2% being sufficient for eliminating binding under our test conditions. Thus, phi X174 remains the best choice as a surrogate virus to test barrier materials, and Triton X-100 (0.1%) remains a good choice for reducing hydrophobic binding. In addition, binding of viruses by barrier materials is unlikely to prevent passage of blood-borne pathogens.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (190.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ackermann H. W. Bacteriophage taxonomy in 1987. Microbiol Sci. 1987 Jul;4(7):214–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrah S. R. Chemical factors influencing adsorption of bacteriophage MS2 to membrane filters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Mar;43(3):659–663. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.3.659-663.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrah S. R., Shah D. O., Ingram L. O. Effects of chaotropic and antichaotropic agents on elution of poliovirus adsorbed on membrane filters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1229–1232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lytle C. D., Routson L. B., Cyr W. H. A simple method to test condoms for penetration by viruses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):3180–3182. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.9.3180-3182.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lytle C. D., Tondreau S. C., Truscott W., Budacz A. P., Kuester R. K., Venegas L., Schmukler R. E., Cyr W. H. Filtration sizes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and surrogate viruses used to test barrier materials. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Feb;58(2):747–749. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.2.747-749.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lytle C. D., Truscott W., Budacz A. P., Venegas L., Routson L. B., Cyr W. H. Important factors for testing barrier materials with surrogate viruses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Sep;57(9):2549–2554. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.9.2549-2554.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Retta S. M., Herman W. A., Rinaldi J. E., Carey R. F., Herman B. A., Athey T. W. Test method for evaluating the permeability of intact prophylactics to viral-size microspheres under simulated physiologic conditions. Sex Transm Dis. 1991 Apr-Jun;18(2):111–118. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199118020-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shields P. A., Farrah S. R. Influence of salts on electrostatic interactions between poliovirus and membrane filters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Feb;45(2):526–531. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.2.526-531.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]