Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Feb;61(2):718–728. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.2.718-728.1995

Mechanisms of yeast flocculation: comparison of top- and bottom-fermenting strains.

P B Dengis 1, L R Nélissen 1, P G Rouxhet 1
PMCID: PMC167332  PMID: 7574609

Abstract

The flocculation of two brewing yeast strains, top-fermenting strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 38485 and bottom-fermenting strain Saccharomyces carlsbergensis MUCL 28285, has been investigated by means of a turbidimetric test. The two strains showed different electrical properties, a different hydrophobicity, and a different surface chemical composition. They flocculated according to completely different mechanisms; however, no correlation between the cell physicochemical properties and the onset of flocculation was found for either strain. Flocculation of the bottom strain was governed by a lectin-mediated mechanism. It was inhibited by mannose and some other sugars, required calcium specifically, occurred in a narrow pH range different from the isoelectric point, and was not influenced by ethanol. The onset of flocculation at the end of the exponential phase was controlled both by the appearance of "active" lectins at the cell surface and by the decrease in sugar concentration in the solution. Flocculation of the top strain was not inhibited by mannose, did not require the addition of calcium, and took place at the cell isoelectric point. Low concentrations of ethanol broadened the pH range in which the cells flocculated, and flocculation was favored by an increase of ionic strength. Adsorbed ethanol may induce flocculation by reducing the electrostatic repulsion between cells, by decreasing steric stabilization, and/or by allowing the protrusion of polymer chains into the liquid phase. The onset of flocculation was controlled by both a change of the cell surface and an increase in ethanol concentration. The only evidence for an adhesin-mediated mechanism was the specific requirement for a small amount of calcium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (310.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BUCHER T., REDETZKI H. Eine spezifische photometrische Bestimmung von Athylalkohol auf fermentativen Wege. Klin Wochenschr. 1951 Sep 15;29(35-36):615–616. doi: 10.1007/BF01485653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beavan M. J., Belk D. M., Stewart G. G., Rose A. H. Changes in electrophoretic mobility and lytic enzyme activity associated with development of flocculating ability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can J Microbiol. 1979 Aug;25(8):888–895. doi: 10.1139/m79-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beezer A. E., Miles R. J., Sivayogan S. R. Study of the interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with glucose by particle microelectrophoresis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Oct 25;763(3):251–257. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(83)90132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Busscher H. J., Cowan M. M., van der Mei H. C. On the relative importance of specific and non-specific approaches to oral microbial adhesion. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1992 Jun;8(3-4):199–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb04988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. EDDY A. A., RUDIN A. D. The structure of the yeast cell wall. I. Identification of charged groups at the surface. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Mar 18;148(932):419–432. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerin P. A., Dufrene Y., Bellon-Fontaine M. N., Asther M., Rouxhet P. G. Surface properties of the conidiospores of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and their relevance to pellet formation. J Bacteriol. 1993 Aug;175(16):5135–5144. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.16.5135-5144.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jayatissa P. M., Rose A. H. Role of wall phosphomannan in flocculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 1976 Sep;96(1):165–174. doi: 10.1099/00221287-96-1-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kihn J. C., Masy C. L., Mestdagh M. M., Rouxhet P. G. Yeast flocculation: factors affecting the measurement of flocculence. Can J Microbiol. 1988 Jun;34(6):779–781. doi: 10.1139/m88-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kihn J. C., Masy C. L., Mestdagh M. M. Yeast flocculation: competition between nonspecific repulsion and specific bonding in cell adhesion. Can J Microbiol. 1988 Jun;34(6):773–778. doi: 10.1139/m88-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuriyama H., Umeda I., Kobayashi H. Role of cations in the flocculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and discrimination of the corresponding proteins. Can J Microbiol. 1991 May;37(5):397–403. doi: 10.1139/m91-064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MILL P. J. THE NATURE OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN FLOCCULENT CELLS IN THE FLOCCULATION OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. J Gen Microbiol. 1964 Apr;35:61–68. doi: 10.1099/00221287-35-1-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Masy C. L., Henquinet A., Mestdagh M. M. Flocculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: inhibition by sugars. Can J Microbiol. 1992 Dec;38(12):1298–1306. doi: 10.1139/m92-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miki B. L., Poon N. H., James A. P., Seligy V. L. Possible mechanism for flocculation interactions governed by gene FLO1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1982 May;150(2):878–889. doi: 10.1128/jb.150.2.878-889.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohshima H., Kondo T. On the electrophoretic mobility of biological cells. Biophys Chem. 1991 Feb;39(2):191–198. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(91)85021-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shankar C. S., Umesh-Kumar S. A surface lectin associated with flocculation in brewing strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 1994 May;140(Pt 5):1097–1101. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-5-1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smit G., Straver M. H., Lugtenberg B. J., Kijne J. W. Flocculence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells is induced by nutrient limitation, with cell surface hydrophobicity as a major determinant. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Nov;58(11):3709–3714. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.11.3709-3714.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stratford M., Assinder S. Yeast flocculation: Flo1 and NewFlo phenotypes and receptor structure. Yeast. 1991 Aug-Sep;7(6):559–574. doi: 10.1002/yea.320070604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stratford M., Carter A. T. Yeast flocculation: lectin synthesis and activation. Yeast. 1993 Apr;9(4):371–378. doi: 10.1002/yea.320090407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stratford M. Yeast flocculation: a new perspective. Adv Microb Physiol. 1992;33:2–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Straver M. H., Smit G., Kijne J. W. Purification and partial characterization of a flocculin from brewer's yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Aug;60(8):2754–2758. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.8.2754-2758.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Straver M. H., vd Aar P. C., Smit G., Kijne J. W. Determinants of flocculence of brewer's yeast during fermentation in wort. Yeast. 1993 May;9(5):527–532. doi: 10.1002/yea.320090509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES