Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1975 Jul 26;3(5977):197–199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5977.197

Arterial occlusion after cannulation.

P J Evans, J H Kerr
PMCID: PMC1674134  PMID: 1148730

Abstract

The occurrence of ischaemic changes, arterial occlusion, and other complications which may follow percutaneous arterial cannulation was assessed in a survey of 155 patients. No patient complained of or had signs of ischaemic damage though signs of arterial occlusion were found in 33 patients (22%). These signs were significantly more common after periods of cannulation greater than six hours (43%) than after less than six hours cannulation (17%). During recovery from occlusion all patients had palpable pulsation over the artery even though blood flow seemed to be absent. By the end of follow-up blood flow had returned in 19 of the 33 occluded arteries.

Full text

PDF
197

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bedford R. F., Major M. C. Percutaneous radial-artery cannulation--increased safety using teflon catheters. Anesthesiology. 1975 Feb;42(2):219–222. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197502000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bedford R. F., Wollman H. Complications of percutaneous radial-artery cannulation: an objective prospective study in man. Anesthesiology. 1973 Mar;38(3):228–236. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197303000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown A. E., Sweeney D. B., Lumley J. Percutaneous radial artery cannulation. Anaesthesia. 1969 Oct;24(4):532–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1969.tb02906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Downs J. B., Rackstein A. D., Klein E. F., Jr, Hawkins I. F., Jr Hazards of radial-artery catheterization. Anesthesiology. 1973 Mar;38(3):283–286. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197303000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jeresaty R. M., Liss J. P. Effects of brachial artery catheterization on arterial pulse and blood pressure in 203 patients. Am Heart J. 1968 Oct;76(4):481–485. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(68)90134-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES