Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Apr;61(4):1634–1636. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1634-1636.1995

Identification of aquatic Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia by hybridization with species-specific rRNA gene probes.

L G Leff 1, R M Kernan 1, J V McArthur 1, L J Shimkets 1
PMCID: PMC167421  PMID: 7538282

Abstract

Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia is a common environmental bacterium which can be pathogenic for plants and humans. In this study, four strategies were used to identify aquatic isolates: API test strips, hybridization with species-specific DNA probes for the 16S and 23S rRNA genes, fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles, and growth on selective medium (TB-T agar [C. Hagedorn, W. D. Gould, T. R. Bardinelli, and D. R. Gustarson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2265-2268, 1987]). Only 59% of the isolates identified as B. cepacia with the API test strips were confirmed as B. cepacia by using fatty acid profiles. The 23S rRNA probe generated a few false-positive results but dramatically underestimated the number of B. cepacia isolates (i.e., 40% of the colonies that did not hybridize to the probe were B. cepacia, as determined by FAME). The 16S rRNA probe generated more false-positive results than the 23S rRNA probe but was effective in identifying the majority of the B. cepacia isolates. The selective medium was only partially successful in recovering B. cepacia. Use of the B. cepacia-specific 16S rRNA probe was the most efficient and accurate way of identifying B. cepacia.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braun-Howland E. B., Vescio P. A., Nierzwicki-Bauer S. A. Use of a simplified cell blot technique and 16S rRNA-directed probes for identification of common environmental isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Oct;59(10):3219–3224. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.10.3219-3224.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hagedorn C., Gould W. D., Bardinelli T. R., Gustavson D. R. A selective medium for enumeration and recovery of Pseudomonas cepacia biotypes from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Sep;53(9):2265–2268. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.9.2265-2268.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Knowlton S., Berry A., Torrey J. G. Evidence that associated soil bacteria may influence root hair infection of actinorhizal plants by Frankia. Can J Microbiol. 1980 Aug;26(8):971–977. doi: 10.1139/m80-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McArthur J. V., Kovacic D. A., Smith M. H. Genetic diversity in natural populations of a soil bacterium across a landscape gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9621–9624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mukwaya G. M., Welch D. F. Subgrouping of Pseudomonas cepacia by cellular fatty acid composition. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Dec;27(12):2640–2646. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.12.2640-2646.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shimkets L. J., Asher S. J. Use of recombination techniques to examine the structure of the csg locus of Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Jan;211(1):63–71. doi: 10.1007/BF00338394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES