Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 May;61(5):1763–1769. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1763-1769.1995

Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin.

J Douwes 1, P Versloot 1, A Hollander 1, D Heederik 1, G Doekes 1
PMCID: PMC167439  PMID: 7646014

Abstract

The influence of various filter types and extraction conditions on the quantitation of airborne endotoxin with the Limulus amebocyte lysate test was studied by using airborne dusts sampled in a potato processing plant. Samples were collected with an apparatus designed to provide parallel samples. Data from the parallel-sampling experiment were statistically evaluated by using analysis of variance. In addition, the influence of storage conditions on the detectable endotoxin concentration was investigated by using commercially available lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and endotoxin-containing house dust extracts. The endotoxin extraction efficiency of 0.05% Tween 20 in pyrogen-free water was seven times higher than that of pyrogen-free water only. Two-times-greater amounts of endotoxin were extracted from glass fiber, Teflon, and polycarbonate filters than from cellulose ester filters. The temperature and shaking intensity during extraction were not related to the extraction efficiency. Repeated freeze (-20 degrees C)-and-thaw cycles with commercial LPS reconstituted in pyrogen-free water had a dramatic effect on the detectable endotoxin level. A 25% loss in endotoxin activity per freeze-thaw cycle was observed. Storage of LPS samples for a period of 1 year at 7 degrees C had no effect on the endotoxin level. House dust extracts showed a decrease of about 20% in the endotoxin level after they had been frozen and thawed for a second time. The use of different container materials (borosilicate glass, "soft" glass, and polypropylene) did not result in different endotoxin levels. This study indicates that the assessment of endotoxin exposure may differ considerably between groups when different sampling, extraction, and storage procedures are employed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (397.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Castellan R. M., Olenchock S. A., Hankinson J. L., Millner P. D., Cocke J. B., Bragg C. K., Perkins H. H., Jr, Jacobs R. R. Acute bronchoconstriction induced by cotton dust: dose-related responses to endotoxin and other dust factors. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Aug;101(2):157–163. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-2-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavagna G., Foà V., Vigliani E. C. Effects in man and rabbits of inhalation of cotton dust or extracts and purified endotoxins. Br J Ind Med. 1969 Oct;26(4):314–321. doi: 10.1136/oem.26.4.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper J. F. Resolving LAL Test interferences. J Parenter Sci Technol. 1990 Jan-Feb;44(1):13–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dust mite allergens and asthma--a worldwide problem. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Feb;83(2 Pt 1):416–427. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90128-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eduard W., Lacey J., Karlsson K., Palmgren U., Ström G., Blomquist G. Evaluation of methods for enumerating microorganisms in filter samples from highly contaminated occupational environments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Aug;51(8):427–436. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagmar L., Schütz A., Hallberg T., Sjöholm A. Health effects of exposure to endotoxins and organic dust in poultry slaughter-house workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990;62(2):159–164. doi: 10.1007/BF00383592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollander A., Heederik D., Kauffman H. Acute respiratory effects in the potato processing industry due to a bioaerosol exposure. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Feb;51(2):73–78. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.2.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hollander A., Heederik D., Versloot P., Douwes J. Inhibition and enhancement in the analysis of airborne endotoxin levels in various occupational environments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993 Nov;54(11):647–653. doi: 10.1080/15298669391355189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kennedy S. M., Christiani D. C., Eisen E. A., Wegman D. H., Greaves I. A., Olenchock S. A., Ye T. T., Lu P. L. Cotton dust and endotoxin exposure-response relationships in cotton textile workers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Jan;135(1):194–200. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1987.135.1.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Milton D. K., Feldman H. A., Neuberg D. S., Bruckner R. J., Greaves I. A. Environmental endotoxin measurement: the Kinetic Limulus Assay with Resistant-parallel-line Estimation. Environ Res. 1992 Apr;57(2):212–230. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Milton D. K., Gere R. J., Feldman H. A., Greaves I. A. Endotoxin measurement: aerosol sampling and application of a new Limulus method. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Jun;51(6):331–337. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Novitsky T. J., Schmidt-Gengenbach J., Remillard J. F. Factors affecting recovery of endotoxin adsorbed to container surfaces. J Parenter Sci Technol. 1986 Nov-Dec;40(6):284–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olenchock S. A., Lewis D. M., Mull J. C. Effects of different extraction protocols on endotoxin analyses of airborne grain dusts. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Dec;15(6):430–435. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PERNIS B., VIGLIANI E. C., CAVAGNA C., FINULLI M. The role of bacterial endotoxins in occupational diseases caused by inhaling vegetable dusts. Br J Ind Med. 1961 Apr;18:120–129. doi: 10.1136/oem.18.2.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rylander R. Organic dusts and lung reactions--exposure characteristics and mechanisms for disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985 Jun;11(3 Spec No):199–206. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smid T., Heederik D., Houba R., Quanjer P. H. Dust- and endotoxin-related respiratory effects in the animal feed industry. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Dec;146(6):1474–1479. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.6.1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sonesson A., Larsson L., Schütz A., Hagmar L., Hallberg T. Comparison of the limulus amebocyte lysate test and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for measuring lipopolysaccharides (endotoxins) in airborne dust from poultry-processing industries. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1271–1278. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1271-1278.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walters M., Milton D., Larsson L., Ford T. Airborne environmental endotoxin: a cross-validation of sampling and analysis techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Mar;60(3):996–1005. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.3.996-1005.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES